tigerdave said:I’d rather see him smashing other players & not ours.
none of our players will be playing in the NEAFL
tigerdave said:I’d rather see him smashing other players & not ours.
DavidSSS said:I would think another side will go for Townsend, he does have a fair bit of upside and I would certainly have a go at using him as a tagger.
Yes but why leave for a year on their rookie list, he might as well stay with us.tigerlove said:Why 2 years? Their first rookie picks before ours, they could just pick him up as a rookie.
ahyeahnah said:Yes but why leave for a year on their rookie list, he might as well stay with us.
But Sydney are on the record saying that they want him because he adds experience and support for Franklin. If they think that he can add that level of improvement to their list they may have a bigger picture for him.tigerlove said:Because we didn't want him on our main list which means he now has the option to go into the draft. He then doesn't get to choose which team he wants to play for. He is drafted to whichever team picks him first. His only option then would be to not accept and sit out of AFL footy. I don't think a 2 year deal would be on the cards for any other team choosing to pick him up. They don't have to offer 2 years.
ahyeahnah said:But Sydney are on the record saying that they want him because he adds experience and support for Franklin. If they think that he can add that level of improvement to their list they may have a bigger picture for him.
Also if GWS are in fact looking at redrafting him then Sydney need to take it more seriously
ahyeahnah said:But Sydney are on the record saying that they want him because he adds experience and support for Franklin. If they think that he can add that level of improvement to their list they may have a bigger picture for him.
Also if GWS are in fact looking at redrafting him then Sydney need to take it more seriously
The Lurker said:Would suit the more compact SCG, could inflict some pain on oppositions there...
And that's exactly why I reckon Sydney are taking him seriouslyThe Lurker said:Would suit the more compact SCG, could inflict some pain on oppositions there...
Tigers of Old said:Either we want him or we don't surely? There's no room for sentiment in today's game. If he's not part of the furture plans, he's a list clogger.
zippadeee said:The club has an obligation to keep him on the list.
He was one of the major reasons we ended a 37 year drought.
You don't throw them away. Your telling me that he isn't worth a spot on a list of 42? Whatever it is.
People want to lose him and then go out and pick up the X Collingwood dud or Grigg that failed both at Geelong and Adelaide. Townsend just won the best VFL player, the best and strongest comp outside the AFL.
Clubs are Bulit on people like Townsend, he stays.
P.s hopefully the bloke that goes through social media at the club reads this...