Just wondering is this Official ?The Big Richo said:I'm surprised Townsend and Chol are being cut ahead of Drummond.
Just wondering is this Official ?The Big Richo said:I'm surprised Townsend and Chol are being cut ahead of Drummond.
DjJazzyPete said:Just wondering is this Official ?
DirtyDogTiger said:Well it MIGHT have happened but it’s not announced.
I’ve only heard it on the post above.
Without cutting Towner and Chol, we’ve got to fill the following spots.
17, 37, 64, 68, rookie rookie
So if Towner goes, we get a kid worth 70ish in the draft.
I don’t think that’s good value.
DirtyDogTiger said:So if Towner goes, we get a kid worth 70ish in the draft.
DirtyDogTiger said:Well it MIGHT have happened but it’s not announced.
I’ve only heard it on the post above.
Without cutting Towner and Chol, we’ve got to fill the following spots.
17, 37, 64, 68, rookie rookie
So if Towner goes, we get a kid worth 70ish in the draft.
I don’t think that’s good value.
James said:I may be wrong but with Lynch and Moore on the list we currently have 36 players and just 2 eligible to remain rookies, Baker and Eggy. If Townsend is delisted that leaves us with 3 player positions and 4 rookie positions to fill on draft night?
zippadeee said:We might else use pick 17 on Townsend because :we draft another Ellis, Ellis or Lennon with it anyway
Totally agree with you. Surely we can keep him on the list and if he only plays in half a dozen games and is effective, as we know he can be, then it's worth it.Tigaman said:Higgins jumped the queue in his first year & squeezed out Towner. Higgins aint got a Premiership Medal but Towner does. Chalk & cheese Higgins & Towner but come GF day Towner did not let us down nor did Higgins in Finals loss to the Pies. IMO I would keep Towner on the books . Been in the system seven years, only 24 & knows what is required of him.
DirtyDogTiger said:So if Towner goes, we only get a kid at pick 70ish in the draft.
I don’t think that’s good value.
DirtyDogTiger said:And its shameful treatment of a premiership player.
DirtyDogTiger said:So if Towner goes, we get a kid worth 70ish in the draft.
I don’t think that’s good value.
DirtyDogTiger said:And its shameful treatment of a premiership player.
X2, jb.jb03 said:Townsend was fantastic at the back end of 2017 but the angst around his pending delisting seems OTT.
jb03 said:Townsend was fantastic at the back end of 2017 but the angst around his pending delisting seems OTT.
jb03 said:Townsend was fantastic at the back end of 2017 but the angst around his pending delisting seems OTT.
x4jb03 said:Townsend was fantastic at the back end of 2017 but the angst around his pending delisting seems OTT.
jb03 said:Townsend was fantastic at the back end of 2017 but the angst around his pending delisting seems OTT.
According to you we should trade Rance but keep Townsend, right.....zippadeee said:-100 :'(.
That tackle n the GF is worth a contract extension.
What are we going to do? Get rid of him and bring in a dud like Lennon, Griffens, Ellis, or Vickery to replace him?.
There should be no rush in letting him go.
We should have 4 new kids on the list next year that's ok, but Townsend stays.
zippadeee said:After his game in the preliminary i wouldve traded him.
Totally agree with you. We have Markov, Naish, Baker, Balta, CCJ, Menadue, Moore and another four coming in November, with another couple of spots for delisted free agents.zippadeee said:-100 :'(.
That tackle n the GF is worth a contract extension.
What are we going to do? Get rid of him and bring in a dud like Lennon, Griffens, Ellis, or Vickery to replace him?.
There should be no rush in letting him go.
We should have 4 new kids on the list next year that's ok, but Townsend stays.
tigertim said:According to you we should trade Rance but keep Townsend, right.....