Ivan Maric | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Ivan Maric

Ivan is shorter than the taller rucks and even "shorter" when he can't jump
The taller rucks give their mid field first use and some cheap possessions and scoring shots
Fit Ivan is competitive, worn out Ivan isn't
Vickery is 95 kg and looks too light to bang on all day with the big rucks
We just need a mobile tall monster to add into the mix, 205 plus with long arms please
 
billyb#40 said:
Ivan is shorter than the taller rucks and even "shorter" when he can't jump
The taller rucks give their mid field first use and some cheap possessions and scoring shots
Fit Ivan is competitive, worn out Ivan isn't
Vickery is 95 kg and looks too light to bang on all day with the big rucks
We just need a mobile tall monster to add into the mix, 205 plus with long arms please

That's pretty much what I think, billyb. Thanks for putting it so well.
 
People saying that Maric was *smile* in the final have rocks in there heads.
He was up against 2 quality ruckman, without any support.( Yes I mean having vickery in the ruck.)
He played his heart out in that game. In the 2nd half the usual suspects disappeared but Maric played to the last second of the game.
If super coach knew what he was doing, he should've at least had big O on the bench
 
Big O, zips?

Big O is 31 and has not played AFL football because he is flimsy. Warnock is a leper but he had his GF against us.

It's not about Cotchin or Deledio who won or got square. Maric got it clean in the colon. In how many games in 2013 did Gibbs get twelve clearances?

OK. Supercoach got smashed, but if you can play, Supercoach doesn't matter. Maric's lack of ruck defence hurt us. Real bad. Here's a notion - molested.

Next year, if we play Carlton in the first final (they won't go any further) we should get . . . Damien Oliver to ruck for us - at least he can be criticised. (But only for trying too hard.)

Maric? Part of the problem. Bad season - pansy final.
 
Dyer'ere said:
Big O, zips?

Big O is 31 and has not played AFL football because he is flimsy. Warnock is a leper but he had his GF against us.

It's not about Cotchin or Deledio who won or got square. Maric got it clean in the colon. In how many games in 2013 did Gibbs get twelve clearances?

OK. Supercoach got smashed, but if you can play, Supercoach doesn't matter. Maric's lack of ruck defence hurt us. Real bad. Here's a notion - molested.

Next year, if we play Carlton in the first final (they won't go any further) we should get . . . Damien Oliver to ruck for us - at least he can be criticised. (But only for trying too hard.)

Maric? Part of the problem. Bad season - pansy final.

Just proves we all watched the same thing and came out with a different conclusion
Houli lost that game
 
We were smashed at the CBs, zips.

Is that controversial? Help me here. I want to be wrong.

Warnock, whose back is full of Doritos... was too much man for our Ivan. Our man. Got endoscopied.
 
Kruze and Warnock won the taps but had a combined 10 possestions, combined. Number one pick and a high second rounder right there......


Anyway Maric, who cost less than either of Carltons rucks, had 16 touches, 6 clearances and we had a extra runner because we didn't play the big O.

Surely Maric did enough to have a fighting draw to allow our glamours to win the game? Any chance of some of our well paid top 3 draftees showing up to play for 4 quarters against Carlton? Any chance one of them might stop being humiliated by Gibbs?
 
Irrespective of those important and granted stats, El Colon, Maric got it clean in the second half of our only final ever. Not to exaggerate.

Maric was the main problem. Goal of the year? LOL. He owed plenty. A ruckmen can be useless but he can not let the team bleed. We bled. Carnage is a euphemism.
 
Dyer'ere said:
Irrespective of those important and granted stats, El Colon, Maric got it clean in the second half of our only final ever. Not to exaggerate.

Maric was the main problem. Goal of the year? LOL. He owed plenty. A ruckmen can be useless but he can not let the team bleed. We bled. Carnage is a euphemism.

Look Maric isn't a match winner, but he's a 6.5-7 out of 10 ruck, you put Maric in Hawthorn they win the flag still. The cost of getting to an 8 is a first round pick, not worth it. Maybe we can get another 6 out of 10 cheaply and they can tag team, allow Maric to nurse another two good season out of his body.

Or to put things in your terms. Name one person on the Richmond team that could share a cell with Maric and not wind up making the beds?
 
Appreciate your POV capitano, but the big O would've helped in the second half.

Big Ivan was outta gas and Tyrone was puffing his chest out and avoiding contact at the same time. Hard to do BTW.

A conundrum to debate over summer. We need Tyrone to be ruckman #2 but he ain't that yet.
 
Carter said:
Big Ivan was outta gas and Tyrone was puffing his chest out and avoiding contact at the same time. Hard to do BTW..

This mad me chortle. Hard. I had this thinking 12 months back, that's why I wanted Grundy.

Maric slowed dramatically the last 6 weeks of 2012. And not once in 2013 did he look the 2012 version.

I agree with Jack, Ivan got destroyed at the centre bounces in that final.
 
We lost the game in the ruck. Insert mummy into that game instead of maric - we win by 5 goals.
 
Carlton won the taps, but so did Sandi is the GF. Our midfield stoped running hard and manning up in second half. Ivvy was a warrior
 
Heh heh. Rucks #1 and #2 were not good in that test. Maybe they'll improve. But IMO the panel should make a call on at least one of them.

Vickery is a rare bird. He's a part time ruck but not a key forward. Not #1. Not #2. Does not hit the ball in the air. He finds holes and works the ground ball. He's a six-six medium. BTW isn't that what McBean is going to be at 19yo?

Rucks can be good or average but a ruck who bleeds leads to carnage. A ruck must never bleed. Bleed means let the other ruck dominate the taps - that is to say get his elbow clear of the other ruck's hand. This is a disaster. It's seppuku. Kick a roving goal? Lovely - kick another four.
 
Judd did the razzle-dazzle and he seemed to be the difference.

I beg to differ: the difference was Warnock. Absolutely pantsed Maric.

As crazy as it seems: no Warnock, no Carlton, at least on that particular day.
 
a better ruck would make us a better side, no doubt. but at what cost?
we won games when Maric was beaten this year, such as the Weagles. The hawks showed in the GF you can win whilst getting beat easy in the ruck.
it is widely acknowledged the 2 best rucks going around this year played for the doggies and the roos.

would i be happy picking up a good ruck as a FA? yes.
as a trade for a late pick? yes
for a 1st/2nd round pick? mmmm, they would have to be very good IMO.

as Col put it:

Col.W.Kurtz said:
Look Maric isn't a match winner, but he's a 6.5-7 out of 10 ruck, you put Maric in Hawthorn they win the flag still. The cost of getting to an 8 is a first round pick, not worth it. Maybe we can get another 6 out of 10 cheaply and they can tag team, allow Maric to nurse another two good season out of his body.

Or to put things in your terms. Name one person on the Richmond team that could share a cell with Maric and not wind up making the beds?