I know you've been banging on about the midfield but the midfield isn't why we lost either of the last 2 weeks and thats despite missing 2 of our best mids last week and 1 of them this.
We lost due to composure within the F50 arc.
Yes we need a deeper midfield but its a cop out to try and claim that its the midfield that are costing us games right now.
We dominated field position, and each of the last 2 weeks we controlled the game enough where we should have kicked 100+ points in both weeks. Thats not a week midfield, yes it can be strengthened but the reason why we failed the last 2 weeks is due to composure and efficiency in front of goal. Nothing more, nothing less.
Yep, I send my apologies to Robbie Tarrant.
Initially thought he was a poor selection, but he's doing an excellent job.
Grimes, Tarrant, Broad.
Hugo, Balta, Rioli
That's my back 6 for the rest of the season. Set and forget.
Gibcus?
Read my post again. I said we do need a deeper midfield, and yes earlier in the season you are right, but to be fair this year is the first time we have really seen the impact of 666 causing these sort of swings in momentum. No-one here will claim that we need to improve our midfield (again I mentioned that in this post) but take the last 2 weeks, midfield have actually performed fairly well even though they have been severely undermanned.
Last 2 weeks have not been lost due to midfield. Even when North kicked what 7 in a row, that wasn't because we folded and they kept winning it out of the midfield, we hit back and then butchered it again inside of 50. The one time they got ascendancy and won several centre clearances in a row, was when 1 of the maggots decided all of a sudden to pay some ruck frees (all against Nank, 3 in a row I think) and then decided not to pay another ruck infringement at all for the rest of the game. It was bizarre what happened with those ruck duels.
Its also a fallacy to call this the stopping momentum focus. That would be if we were being smashed in centre clearances which we haven't been beaten in centre clearances all game, we have struggled around the ground for whatever reason so 666 isn't hitting us that hard (we get as many run ons as our opposition do) but yesterday we conceded at least 3 goals from forward 50 stoppages.
Having said all that, I still go back to our efficiency the last 2 weeks and stand by the fact that we have lost the last 2 weeks due to shots at goal. Nothing more.
Ahhhhhh, thank you Astute.Vlustuin?
This theory that assistants won us flags just grinds my gears. Coaching is about a team, there is a head coach and assistants but the ultimate decisions come from the head Coach.
Like any leadership position the success of the leader is not just what that person does but the team he or she builds around them and how they are managed, whether they are empowered and listened to.
Having good assistants and leading them and moulding them into a team is a big part of being a good coach imo.
Saying a 3 time premiership coach is some sort of lame duck made to look good by assistants is just garbage imo.
We do.If we actually had a big-bodied mid to stand alongside Dion at stoppage we would be even better and the past two losses would certainly not have occurred, with or without the poor conversion.
i would definitely worry how bifurcated that midfield is. could cost us the premiership;I wouldn't be too upset starting 2023 with Dusty, Prestia, Baker, Bolton, Ross, Graham, Sonsie as our midfield rotation, though the age profile is disproportionately bifurcated.
considering we have played 7 defenders each week for the last 10 years, you can fit Hugo in off the bench.Ahhhhhh, thank you Astute.
Had that strange feeling I'd missed someone.
Of course, Vlastuin for Hugo.
Which saddens me, because I'd love to find a way to get games into Hugo, but at this stage he's certainly not replacing Nick V or Marlion and Kmac on the wings
we had the most I50s for the round, and the most scoring shots.Read my post again. I said we do need a deeper midfield, and yes earlier in the season you are right, but to be fair this year is the first time we have really seen the impact of 666 causing these sort of swings in momentum. No-one here will claim that we need to improve our midfield (again I mentioned that in this post) but take the last 2 weeks, midfield have actually performed fairly well even though they have been severely undermanned.
Last 2 weeks have not been lost due to midfield. Even when North kicked what 7 in a row, that wasn't because we folded and they kept winning it out of the midfield, we hit back and then butchered it again inside of 50. The one time they got ascendancy and won several centre clearances in a row, was when 1 of the maggots decided all of a sudden to pay some ruck frees (all against Nank, 3 in a row I think) and then decided not to pay another ruck infringement at all for the rest of the game. It was bizarre what happened with those ruck duels.
Its also a fallacy to call this the stopping momentum focus. That would be if we were being smashed in centre clearances which we haven't been beaten in centre clearances all game, we have struggled around the ground for whatever reason so 666 isn't hitting us that hard (we get as many run ons as our opposition do) but yesterday we conceded at least 3 goals from forward 50 stoppages.
Having said all that, I still go back to our efficiency the last 2 weeks and stand by the fact that we have lost the last 2 weeks due to shots at goal. Nothing more.
Wrong again.
Poor conversion is of course an issue at the moment, but that does not mean our midfield has been magically fixed in the last two weeks.
We generate all those inside 50s on turnover.
If we actually had a big-bodied mid to stand alongside Dion at stoppage we would be even better and the past two losses would certainly not have occurred, with or without the poor conversion.
Folks like you are looking too much at the surface malaise. Kicking at goal comes and goes. We’ve had games this year where conversion has been excellent.
It is the midfield where the deep, festering problem lies and the coaches know it.
I'm actually glad that you think I'm wrong, as that most likely means I'm right.
You clearly haven't read any of my posts by the way. I've never claimed that our midfield cannot be improved and absolutely needs to be.
If there was an award for the most hyperbole spouted, you and Zips would lead it in a canter.