ICE said:2 to 3 weeks to resume full training
another 2 to 3 weeks for fitness and form
Would be fantastic if he came in Round 17 and the balance of the year thereafter
That is a possibility.Six Shirts and a Suit said:I fear Dylan Grimes is going to end up our next Mark Coughlan. So much talent but injury is going to cruel his career. His body just cannot cope with the rigours of AFL football. Fix one thing and then it is just the next weakest link in the chain. I don't think we bank on him being a central piece in our backline given he just won't be on the park enough. Good luck to him though as he would be a 'gun' otherwise....just like Cogs.
Six Shirts and a Suit said:I fear Dylan Grimes is going to end up our next Mark Coughlan. So much talent but injury is going to cruel his career. His body just cannot cope with the rigours of AFL football. Fix one thing and then it is just the next weakest link in the chain. I don't think we bank on him being a central piece in our backline given he just won't be on the park enough. Good luck to him though as he would be a 'gun' otherwise....just like Cogs.
Danog said:Grimes for Frawley?
zippadeee said:Grimes & our 1st pick would do it.
The bloke isn't reliable. And the talk of him playing in the finals (if we make it) scares me.
Out of his 23-25 games how many has he hobbled off in?
Wouldn't consider him unless we no other option.
lamb22 said:Absolute crazy talk. Frawley can be good defensively but is woeful offensively, He is barely a 6 out of 10 footballer and often a liability.
Grimes is an 8 out of 10 footballer and with continuity likely to be better than that.
First I'd never trade Grimes, second I wouldn't take Frawley unless he was real cheap.
Third, if you theoretically traded Grimes you'd take nothing less than a top 3 pick and that's because a quality defender who is a smart decision maker and good rebounder is gold ......Jerry.
Only Carlisle would have him covered among <23 yo defenders. (Maybe Thompson from GC as well)
What would be the point of trading him for a speculative pick? The best you could hope to get of it would be another Dylan grimes, and we already have one of those.zippadeee said:R u serious? He would be lucky to be worth pick 40-50.
What club would give you a 1st rounder for him?
zippadeee said:R u serious? He would be lucky to be worth pick 40-50.
What club would give you a 1st rounder for him?
Coburgtiger said:What would be the point of trading him for a speculative pick? The best you could hope to get of it would be another Dylan grimes, and we already have one of those.
There's no medical reason to suggest that once he gets back from the foot he's likely to get injured again.