When did Swanie say that tigers80, was it tonight or did you go back to the archives?tigers80 said:Interesting the conversation has changed from looking for success to money.
I personally think the journos are getting little bit desperate because
1. They haven't got a clue what's going on
2. The decision was always going to come after the season.
his good mate Dane Swan
He’s in a very good spot, he loves Richmond and he’s playing some incredible footy there,” Swan told Fox Sports News’ AFL
“And I think Richmond is just on the verge of some success which they haven’t had for a long time. Speaking to Dusty, I know that’s something that drives him, not just the big contract which he’s gonna get no matter what but playing finals.
“There’s light at the end of the tunnel with Richmond ... and I think that’s going to go a long way to helping him stay there.”
Hopefully Dimma can sell some more of his snake oil so he can add money to the keep Dusty at Richmond fund!btoz_01 said:Dusty is worth $1.2Mill pa over 5 years
FFS were paying our midget $700K pa with the players 20% increase that would be now $840K pa. So Our A grader Dusty is only worth $160K pa more than our midget?
An offer of $1.2Mill pa is really only $1Mill before the players got their extra 20% increase
Come on RFC $1.2Mill pa is fair just get it done!
caesar said:When did Swanie say that tigers80, was it tonight or did you go back to the archives?
I think we would match 1.2 but don't want to offer it because Ralph would just use as a bargaining chip to up the ante with other clubs making it harder for us to match.btoz_01 said:Dusty is worth $1.2Mill pa over 5 years
FFS were paying our midget $700K pa with the players 20% increase that would be now $840K pa. So Our A grader Dusty is only worth $160K pa more than our midget?
An offer of $1.2Mill pa is really only $1Mill before the players got their extra 20% increase
Come on RFC $1.2Mill pa is fair just get it done!
Thought that was the case, landscape can change quickly so anything is possible.tigers80 said:Interview on fox footy earlier this year.
I have noticed a few times you mentioned that the increase in TPP means an increase in a current comtract. Are you for real, is every player currently contracted going to get the increase or only new contracts post the new deal? Someone tell me a contract is a contract.btoz_01 said:Dusty is worth $1.2Mill pa over 5 years
FFS were paying our midget $700K pa with the players 20% increase that would be now $840K pa. So Our A grader Dusty is only worth $160K pa more than our midget?
An offer of $1.2Mill pa is really only $1Mill before the players got their extra 20% increase
Come on RFC $1.2Mill pa is fair just get it done!
Baloo said:He's staying. If he wasn't it'd be confirmed he's out by all media.
leon said:Like it was with Buddy?
we need something. What happens at the 'end of the season' if we find we can't match the offer? We lose him and then have nothing to replace him? It's not like we can say to Kelly, " if Dusty doesn't sign, then we want you, but if he does,then we don't".zgod said:Surely the time has arrived for a verbal agreement behind closed doors.
We have others out of contract.
Contracts are never as simple as $6 million over 6 years as has been reported. It probably includes bonuses for finishes in the b&F, games played, increases as per the eba etc etc. So Caro's probably about righttigers80 said:Caro reckons we are 1.1 to 1.2m already on offer from us.