tigersnake said:They didn't steal our country.
You might be part of the problem you seek to address mate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other
tigersnake said:They didn't steal our country.
Panthera tigris FC said:Good posting.
Just an aside, I thought that indigenous Australians had no domesticated crops to plant? To this day the only native Australian plant (or animal for that matter) to be domesticated is the macadamia, AFAIK.
Meh.U2Tigers said:No one has the right to burn a flag, and it should be illegal to do so.
evo said:Sounds vaguely like Dimaond's argument in Guns, germs and steel.. Seemed a bit lame to me.
evo said:You might be part of the problem you seek to address mate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other
Not really. But I was in New Zealand's 'kumara country' the other day. Apparently the Maoris carried the kumara by boat, probably rowing from Tahiti to New Zealand. Now that's commitment to crop development! ;DPanthera tigris FC said:Exactly like Diamond's thesis. I used guarded language for a reason. Do you know more about it?
tigersnake said:I know all about the concept. Whats your point?
As I've said repeatedly, we'll be able to move on together once the majority of non-indigenous Australians a) understand the situation and b) give a sh!t.
evo said:I don't agree. I think we will move on together when people stop thinking it is situation of 'us' and 'them'.
evo said:Meh.
the only reason flag burning is effective is because you feel that way.
tigersnake said:We will all move on together when us starts to understand them.
Tigers of Old said:Works both ways doesn't it?
tigersnake said:We will all move on together when us starts to understand them. To suggest we can wave all the issues aside and pretend we're all starting off even is simplistic and naive.
De Beauvoir calls the Other the minority, the least favored one and often a woman, when compared to a man, "for a man represents both the positive and the neutral, as indicated by the common use of man to designate human beings in general; whereas woman represents only the negative, defined by limiting criteria, without reciprocity" (McCann, 33). Betty Friedan supported this thought when she interviewed women and the majority of them identified themselves in their role in the private sphere, rather than addressing their own personal achievements. They automatically identified as the Other without knowing. Although the Other may be influenced by a socially constructed society, one can argue that society has the power to change this creation (Haslanger).
In an effort to dismantle the notion of the Other, Cheshire Calhoun proposed a deconstruction of the word "woman" from a subordinate association and to reconstruct it by proving women do not need to be rationalized by male dominance.[11] This would contribute to the idea of the Other and minimize the hierarchal connotation this word implies.
evo said:Who said anything about being even? Besides, how does one promote this goal of being even when all they keep doing is reminding everyone of the divide? As I said in my first response, it seems to me to do the complete opposite.
In my view, the philosophy surrounding 'Other' was one of the great steps forward in humankind's thinking in the 20th Century. It heralded the early feminist movement, for example. i'd love to see people really get to understand what it is really about.
substitute woman for aboriginal, and non-aboriginal for man.....
tigersnake said:But the brevity of your post implies its 2 evenly matched sides trying to get along, thats not the case.
Massive Tiger said:They were made to understand at the point of a gun, by being hunted down and murdered, by being used as sexual slaves, by being poisoned and diseased, by being force fed the bible, by being pushed onto the useless land the whites didn't want.
And so on. Happened all over the world as the Euros explored and claimed and invaded and exploited the far flung parts of the globe.
So, we do we see this as a wrong that has to be righted, a case of progress so it's too bad, or do we just not care and forget all about it because it is in the past?
tigersnake said:second, its easy to say 'hey we're all on the same side now let all get along' when you're on the winning side, when you're the one who has been doing the shafting.