I have posted on this before.
The idea that we need a fresh look coaching wise is IMO too premature. We are in a transition period regarding the list. But I do believe that there is a lot of promising young players on our list.
People (on here and many footy ‘experts’) calling for change seem to believe that we went all in this year with an ageing list to try and pinch another flag. Exhibit A apparently trading away amongst other things a first round pick for Taranto and Hopper.
The fact that our poor start to the season seems to have ruled us out of a flag chase is seen as a failure. But there are some big assumptions in this position, not the least being that that is what the club thought.
I take a different view. Firstly, I think we are right in the hunt for a finals spot this year. We are a team, even now, that no one really wants to play in a final.
Secondly, while I think the club did try to give itself the best chance of a flag that it could this year, it also has a longer term view that was actually the priority. The recruitment of Taranto and Hopper was about providing a solid midfield platform for moving forward in the next few years with a promising list of young players. Yes we will have some holes to cover and it cost us a first round pick, but the bedrock framework is still there.
Quite frankly, Dimma is in the best couple of coaches in the league at the moment. Coaches with his experience, ability and success rate are rarely available at any time, let alone at the moment. He has a proven track record, at our club for goodness sake, of building a formidably successful team.
I think he remains the best coach for us. If he wants out, then OK, but if he wants to stay, we need to facilitate that. Reinvigoration can come in many forms. If we need it, then go for it but I don’t see that issue being properly addressed by replacing Dimma.