It's crazy. I think its the fact the Poms have regenrated interest in Test cricket and are doing well that gets up everyones nose.
Well, the fans on PRE anyway.
I'm not sure what people want, for England to go back to boring cricket, trying to bat out for draws? Dull boring, scoring at less than 3 an over?
The term Bazball seems to be the thing that gets peoples backs up, as the way its termed I think is seen as a revolution in cricket, when this is really a revolution in ENGLISH cricket. The name is largely for the English public not something that is aimed at pushing other teams.
England is not Australia when it comes to learning cricket from young ages, when I grew up in the 80's and 90's over there, you barely even played cricket in schools. Aussies tend to assume that we did, but the facts are we didn't. There were other sports that were played, winter sports such as soccer and rugby, in the summer we generally played athletics, tennis, hockey and rounders when I was at school. I don't even really remember playing cricket bar a bit of french cricket.
That started to change around the time of the Ashes in 2005, but interest in the sport again was waning with England not performing well at the top level of cricket, so IMO this change of approach was focused on (more so than Stokes and McCullum, even though they are the face of it), to garner more interest in the sport, as England is very different to Australia in that we generally don't have the same focus on cricket at a young age as we do here. Thats why I think this focus was there, its all about generating more interest in the sport in England and TBH they have been very successful from that perspective.