Re: Cricket
mk33 said:
Sorry to dance on his grave ToO but just didnt rate him at all, I know he played some great innings for Australia and i acknowledge that and thats why I would have him in a squad of 12-13 best players for Australia in the one day uniform but IMO not the best.
I'm well aware Bevo polarised some people, just don't believe everything you 'read' about the guy he had some notable media types working against him, most notably Ian Chappell whom he had a falling out with in the early 90s. Incidentaly Chappelli labelled S. Waugh a selfish cricketer as well. Go figure. :
You'll note I said he was
arguably our best one day player.
No he was not our biggest hitter but he was excellent at chasing down targets and batting with the lower order to win a game.
I was an unashamed fan and would have him ahead of many of the names you mentioned because he placed such a high value on his wicket in the OD form of the game. If that's percieved as selfish because he tried to win cricket games well ???
He achieved victories on countless occassions for Australia, almost to the point where many expected it and criticized him if he didn't. Where other players recklessly threw their wickets away, Bevan played the anchor role to a tee and could hit boundaries as required. This was openly his role in the side and he played it to perfection.
His running between the wickets, ability to calculate the run rate and chase down a targe, revolutionised the one day game. Mike Hussey(who now plays that role, even better) has openly admitted that Bevan had a huge influence on the way he approached the game. Fair compliment.
It's a bit lame to bring out the ol' chestnut re his shortcomings against the short ball.
He averaged 60 in first class cricket and they bowl bouncers there don't they?
I always felt he failed at test level because it was a confidence issue more than anything rather than technique. The demons got inside his head at test level and no argument he lost the plot. It was unfortunate because I always felt he had it to be a great success. I think the selectors did too hence his number of opportunities. Unfortunately I think Bevan lacked the belief in himself at the highest level and never felt he belonged.
As far as the reintroduction of the short ball at OD cricket, I'd say it had more to do with Ponting's elevation to the captaincy than any reintroduction of the bouncer. After some slight injury concern's, Bevan's diminished role in the side coincided with Ponting's desire to push Symonds and Clarke ahead of him in the order. He was (unfairly IMO) stripped of his ACB contract shortly afterwards only to come out and average 97 in the Pura Cup for Tasmania the season after and play an integral role in the Tiger's title success in the national OD competition.
Bag him all you like Knighter but it won't change my opnion of him. Bevan was a super talent.