Ardern has got it right. Shut life down properly for a month & then have a look at it to see if it's making a genuine difference to the curve.
It was kinda duscussed previously by Lee and TOO - but why aren't governments implementing measures to completely isolate the elderly and health compromised until a vaccine is developed and let the rest go on as usual? The impact of total shut down is gonna be enormous.
He said 14!Why?
1.4^10 = 28.96
3^10 = 59,049
Exponential growth is counter intuitive.
All true Oldie. Repercussions are the worst thing of this now. IMO, this social distancing seems just too ridiculous and overly pedantic. I really doubt we are gonna get hit hard as most think but then again, protocol is protocol.So far we've had 7 deaths in Australia from 1715 cases. 7. In 2 months.
All of which were over 77 years of age. That's old.
That may change but on the face of it that really doesn't look that bad.
So many people lost their jobs today & the market is in free fall. This with no end in sight.
People may toe the line for a while but some stage people are going to rebel against current measures if this continues is my prediction.
I tried explaining to my 15 year old son that he can't catch up with his mates on holidays tonight..
Ended in a massive argument. I found myself sympathising with him. I really did.
Right now this is no way to live & it's having a profound impact on society.
Old people are susceptible but they've already lived a great life it must be said. Yes it's very sad that they may pass away.
My parents included but at the expense of ruining everyone elses? It's going to be a hard sell over the long term..
I tried explaining to my 15 year old son that he can't catch up with his mates on holidays tonight..
Ended in a massive argument. I found myself sympathising with him. I really did.
Right now this is no way to live & it's having a profound impact on society.
Old people are susceptible but they've already lived a great life it must be said. Yes it's very sad that they may pass away.
My parents included but at the expense of ruining everyone elses? It's going to be a hard sell over the long term..
He said 14!
Its only just started. Its not that hard. Saying its no way to live is wrong. Think about the older people and say its no way to die.
Its a test of society. I'll guarantee your 15 year old will sleep easier in 20 years time knowing he wasn't responsible for the deaths of fathers and mothers, grandfathers and grandmothers. All the while learning to look beyond oneself.
So far we've had 7 deaths in Australia from 1715 cases. 7. In 2 months.
All of which were over 77 years of age. That's old.
That may change but on the face of it that really doesn't look that bad.
So many people lost their jobs today & the market is in free fall. This with no end in sight.
People may toe the line for a while but some stage people are going to rebel against current measures if this continues is my prediction.
I tried explaining to my 15 year old son that he can't catch up with his mates on holidays tonight..
Ended in a massive argument. I found myself sympathising with him. I really did.
Right now this is no way to live & it's having a profound impact on society.
Old people are susceptible but they've already lived a great life it must be said. Yes it's very sad that they may pass away.
My parents included but at the expense of ruining everyone elses? It's going to be a hard sell over the long term..
Don't profess to have the answers just shared the convo.
Young people are going to be the hardest sell because they see this as no affecting them because they are no chance to get sick from it. This is where it differs from another pandemic like the Spanish Flu.
Hence the scenes at Bondi Beach.
Telling them it's going to save people 77 & up is not easy.
Well said antman. Posted something similar at the start of this thread.
Young people are going to be the hardest sell because they see this as no affecting them because they are no chance to get sick from it.
Hey CBT, can you chime in on the use of "herd immunity" in relation to unchecked transmission of the virus? It seems to me, lay person, that this is an inappropriate use of jargon to make people sound like they know more than they do. Surely herd immunity involves mass vaccination which is supposed to get to as many people as possible, usually over 95% of the population you are inoculating, and also means they can't then transmit the virus. Allowing people to overcome the virus on their own may improve susceptibility to future infection but it does not mean they cannot still be vectors and thus herd immunity is not achieved? Have got this wrong?
Young people get sick from it. If it is serious, they go to hospital. They are on respirators. They recover. Older people and those with pre-existing conditions generally don't.
If the virus goes bananas, then lots of people get sick, many need to go to hospital. Not enough respirators. Old people die, young people die.
But, I generally agree. There must be a point where such draconian measures are wound back and much less before six months. Trump seems to be indicating his tolerance for a lockdown is 14 days. He'll probably go a month. Australia might go three.
There case increases went down to 20 and are now back up to 80.How have China returned (allegedly) to some normality. Surely they should still be in some sort of lockdown like the rest of the world.
Ok thanks Bill. So no return to normality then.There case increases went down to 20 and are now back up to 80.
This professor explains the difference between transmission rates between the flu and COVID19. Also good for those us who still don't get exponential growth rates.