Absolutely.We'd all like that too, but we acknowledge that this disease kills a lot of people when allowed to run.
I assume you are in the "let it run" camp then?
Ok. Point taken. There is usually an implied tone that third world countries are less trustworthy but I will apologise to you in this instance.So hang on, on one hand you are calling me racist because I showed you a report from the HINDU TIMES that pretty much shows that India have under reported their deaths (I never said anything about it being deliberate). How the hell is that racist? Geez, you say something about someone from another race and everytime its racist? Is that how this thing works?
On the other hand, you continue to spruik the value of something that has yet to be proven beneficial in any way!!
Ok, whatever floats your boat.
so the jab is less than 50 per cent effective?
Just read that on Insta. Good stuff finally.Good to see the Tiges have finally put out pro vaccination posts on social media. The AFL has been very slow to move on this. Our only, best & safest way back to live footy.
Ok. Point taken. There is usually an implied tone that third world countries are less trustworthy but I will apologise to you in this instance.
Uttar Pradesh though is very advanced in its medical and reporting protocols as the attachments showed.
However I will point out that we are 35% fully vaccinated and likely to be in lockdown for the foreseeable future while Uttar Pradesh whose major treatment for Covid is Ivermectin is open for business and not locked down and has negligible cases.
The massive mistake that will eventually be showed in our response to this pandemic is that we ignored treatment because of our fear of transmissability.
BTW there are over 60 trials showing benefit for Ivermectin against Covid.
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 262 studies
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 262 studiesc19ivermectin.com
The Institut Pasteur seems to back some of Lamby's claims
Ivermectin alleviates Covid-19 symptoms in an animal model
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, various therapeutic approaches have been explored to tackle the disease. Scientists from the Institut Pasteur have shown that ivermectin, a drug used commercially as an antiparasitic treatment, offers protection from COVID-19 symptoms in an animal model...www.pasteur.fr
So potentially a treatment for covid. Not sure why so many on here mock something that could treat the sick.Yes.
If you read that it states that Ivermectin potentially reduces inflammation in the respiratory tract, but does nothing to stop viral lifespan or replication. This means you really have to be in a bad way in terms of covid infection for this to be of any benefit. Lots of medications can do that and many are already being used in Covid treatment for severely affected patients.
I wondered why Lamby had made a subtle shift from claiming that Ivermectin was a prophylactic and a covid cure to a "therapeutic". Nice move Lambster.
My feeling is there was quite some cognitive dissonance occurring for the psychologist when trying to reconcile the concerns held for the welfare of the children with information that perhaps the lockdowns were not the answer to combat the virus especially with scientific and medical information showing differing views. The psychologist is also covering herself in a legal capacity.Look I understand where you are getting at with this, but that video using Harm to Children as the headline is ridiculous to then use it in front of a video that is spreading a conspiracy.
I'm not a conspiracist and generally ask 1 question of any conspiracy theories when I review them. What is the purpose of the conspiracy. I just don't see it with Covid. What is the purpose for it? Please enlighten me.
If there are actually peer reviewed cases that make sense of drugs that can treat Covid, they will be presented through the WHO surely.
Its ironic that your video shows the WHO were blocking Invermectin information and then you see Lamby (pushing for Invermectin) praising the WHO for their review of Utter Pradesh. Which is it? Are the WHO on the good side or the bad side?
Yeh, we get nothing but case numbers and exposure sites. How many households are involved? If one member of a household get it what % of the other members are catching it?this to me has been overlooked. I think I know but I am happy tp be updated... I could be innocently increasing my risk to myself or others and would be happy to change that behaviour. Equally there are some things which might have been found to be irrelevant to transmission. Thanks
The main message is "people are doing the wrong thing" .... lets update and reinforce the "right thing"
All we hear about are locations .... so were the cases workmates / customers/ delivery people ... was it transmitted in the lunchroom, office, factory floor, at illegal parties.
One example ... 1.5m distance.. Now that came in Day ONE. Who did the calculations then and why does it still hold for Delta? Why not 2m, or 3m? or 1m?