Coronavirus | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Coronavirus

Here's why we don't have enough Pfizer.


BTW Morrison had Pfizer when he was inoculated.

Taken in isolation; Ive got no problem with our Govt haggling for value for my tax dollar with a giant Pharma company.

but its not in isolation. the LNP shovel tax money to their mates constantly. They sell the Murray River to their big cotton mates for $x, and buy it back dry for $5x.

so you cant be part-time prudent

like an Inverse Robin Hood.

If Angus Taylor, or Joe Hockey had a stake in Pfizer, they'de have been trying to decimultiply the price.

like they do buying French sub-marines, or offshore refugee processing contracts
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Taken in isolation; Ive got no problem with our Govt haggling for value for my tax dollar with a giant Pharma company.

but its not in isolation. the LNP shovel tax money to their mates constantly. They sell the Murray River to their big cotton mates for $x, and buy it back dry for $5x.

so you cant be part-time prudent

like an Inverse Robin Hood.

If Angus Taylor, or Joe Hockey had a stake in Pfizer, they'de have been trying to decimultiply the price.

like they do buying French sub-marines, or offshore refugee processing contracts
Yeah.

There's a time when you haggle, and a time when you say "lockdowns and a closed economy will cost several orders of magnitude more than buying some fracking vaccines"

I read that the vaccination roll-out is costing 4.8 billion, cost to the economy so far from lockdowns alone is 160 billion.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
FFS. Two ”false positives“ now, the main reason for extension.

Three cases today, two kids of a known case and the 89 year aged care resident we knew about.

This super contagious beast doesn‘t seem to be much different to last year. If we get sub three tomorrow, this lockdown can’t last a day longer then scheduled.

The LNP are generally the party of fear mongering. Vic labour staking their claim?
 
Wasn't it a decision of national cabinet?

None of them appear to have played a long game, although what politician does.
But what have the states on that National Cabinet been presenting to Morrison and requesting.... for...what....12 months or more now ?
 
Would love to know what "Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease from Delta" means exactly.....
There is the virus (SARS-CoV-2). And the disease (COVID-19).

No vaccine will protect you against getting the virus.

The percentages are how effective the vaccine is in stopping the virus progressing to the disease.

60% (AZ two doses) is not exactly going to allow people to be foot loose and fancy-free.
 
There is the virus (SARS-CoV-2). And the disease (COVID-19).

No vaccine will protect you against getting the virus.

The percentages are how effective the vaccine is in stopping the virus progressing to the disease.

60% (AZ two doses) is not exactly going to allow people to be foot loose and fancy-free.

60% immunity gets you pretty close to herd immunity and a big reduction in R0. Combine with boosters and other vaccines and you are just about done. It will at least allow you to open the economy and stop lockdowns.
 
There is the virus (SARS-CoV-2). And the disease (COVID-19).

No vaccine will protect you against getting the virus.

The percentages are how effective the vaccine is in stopping the virus progressing to the disease.

60% (AZ two doses) is not exactly going to allow people to be foot loose and fancy-free.
Yeah I know all that.

What I mean is, per your third line, what is the symptomatic level of effectiveness once in disease state. In other words if it is saying that you have a 60% chance of developing no symptoms, then if so, what does it mean in terms of those other 40% i.e. will their disease or symptoms be minor, moderate, chronic, fatal ?

What's the effectiveness of the vaccines thereafter symptomatic development ? e.g. if 90% of the remaining 40% only develop minor cold like symptoms then people will be foot loose and fancy free.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I know all that.

What I mean is, per your third line, what is the symptomatic level of effectiveness once in disease state. In other words if it is saying that you have a 60% chance of developing no symptoms, then if so, what does it mean in terms of those other 40% i.e. will their disease or symptoms be minor, moderate, chronic, fatal ?

What's the effectiveness of the vaccines thereafter symptomatic development ? If 90% of the remaining 40% only develop minor cold like symptoms then people will be foot loose and fancy free.

Yes, and vaccines do actually prevent you from getting the virus in the collective sense. Vaccines reduce contagiousness of the virus as well as symptoms. That means less people catch it even if they are unvaccinated or vaccines are less effective for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yes, and vaccines do actually prevent you from getting the virus in the collective sense. Vaccines reduce contagiousness of the virus as well as symptoms. That means less people catch it even if they are unvaccinated or vaccines are less effective for them.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
But what have the states on that National Cabinet been presenting to Morrison and requesting.... for...what....12 months or more now ?
I don't know - what have they been requesting for more than 12 months?

Do the minutes of these meetings get communicated? If premiers had been asking for national quarantine for 12 months couldn't they just point to the national cabinet meetings and say they (ie the feds) don't listen to me?
 
Last edited:
Yeah I know all that.

What I mean is, per your third line, what is the symptomatic level of effectiveness once in disease state. In other words if it is saying that you have a 60% chance of developing no symptoms, then if so, what does it mean in terms of those other 40% i.e. will their disease or symptoms be minor, moderate, chronic, fatal ?

What's the effectiveness of the vaccines thereafter symptomatic development ? e.g. if 90% of the remaining 40% only develop minor cold like symptoms then people will be foot loose and fancy free.
I don't know whether the vaccine helps you at all if the virus progresses to full-blown disease. I suspect not.
 
I would think a vaccine would precisely help you if it develops to a full blown disease. After all, a vaccine is a heads-up to you immune system on how to combat the virus.

In any case,from what I have read, the vaccines are very good at preventing serious cases of COVID.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I got a typhoid vaccination, and caught typhoid 6 months later.

I couldn't tell you what brand it was? It wasn't a smorgasbord-type situation then.

I assume it was some dead typhoid bits blended up with some chimp plasma?

the doc reckoned if I hadn't had the jab,

instead of spewing and shitting 20-odd kg explosively for a fortnight, with my brain pushing on my skull,

I'd have carked it, and missed the 2017 premiership for eternity.

I dont think its unusual for a vaccine to prevent death.
 
I don't know whether the vaccine helps you at all if the virus progresses to full-blown disease. I suspect not.

The point is that many fewer people will progress to that acute, life threatening covid. I'm not sure what the medical term is for "full blown" and what the distinction is. Maybe Sin or someone could help us on that.