the looney right are better at the game.
The political agenda has clearly moved to the right. Look at Whitlam's agenda back in 1972 and remember he was a member of the NSW Right.
Look at Fraser's agenda (guaranteed partial wage indexation, let refugees in, sanctions against apartheid South Africa etc) through the 1970s and he was considered right wing.
DS
There might be a difference on how influential and effective they are, but that wasn't my point. I was addressing Binman's thought that the right moved right but the left is still more centrist. I disagree, both sides are pulling away, but as you said, the looney right are better at the game.
We need to back away from forcing political outcomes on people that don’t want them. If you want to live under formalised wokeism, then go ahead. If you want to live under a state sanctioned marriage of only men and women, go ahead. We need to formalise procedures of secession so it is easier for people to break into political groupings much closer in line with their beliefs and to give them more power to affect change through a smaller voting block.I agree the edges are finding new ground none of us thought was there. Modern Nazi's? Holocaust deniers? On the other side have a look at "critical theory" this is formalised wokeism and it is insidious and is infecting public institutions via graduates from infected departments in universities. No matter what your victimisation score someone else can be more of a victim, more oppressed, more of a minority.
Or the delusional ravings of the anti-vaxxers.
Not to mention that going by the description apparently the world outside the USA simply doesn't exist.
Not worth my time to watch this drivel.
DS
The page linked has a 25 minute video interview with Dr.Judy Mikovits PHD, Molecular Biologist / Medical Researcher. As I took the time to watch the video I certainly didn't come away with the impression that 'the delusional ravings of an anti-vaxxer' applied to Dr. Mikovits at all. Others are certainly free to come to their own conclusions.
The interview is an excerpt from an upcoming documentary which is being made in the USA although it will have an impact globally.
Looked her up, wow, she has some credibility! Discredited and fraudulent research (let me guess she was setup?). Even her employer (who has his own dubious criminal history) took legal action against her! You know you're going bad when fraudsters sue fraudsters.
Reckon you'll find the virus came from the lizard men.
Confusion amongst experts on advice? Not sure there is a right or wrong in a lot of this.Just on PPE, surprised when I walked into Chemist Warehouse today that there were both Surgical and KN95 masks available, surely this means there is no longer any shortage for our front line workers?
So Australian advice is that wearing a mask is not necessary for its citizens and makes no difference where as in some other countries they have been made mandatory or highly encouraged to wear.
Who is right who is wrong?