I'd leave the back 7 as is - Grimes, Balta, Gibcus, Broad, Vlastuin, Rioli and Baker is a bloody good backline.I heard a whisper that another backman may be tried as a forward. Dimma is throwing the magnets around after some success last week.
I'd leave the back 7 as is - Grimes, Balta, Gibcus, Broad, Vlastuin, Rioli and Baker is a bloody good backline.I heard a whisper that another backman may be tried as a forward. Dimma is throwing the magnets around after some success last week.
Yeah I'm assuming (and hoping) he means a backman not from that group.I'd leave the back 7 as is - Grimes, Balta, Gibcus, Broad, Vlastuin, Rioli and Baker is a bloody good backline.
100%I'd leave the back 7 as is - Grimes, Balta, Gibcus, Broad, Vlastuin, Rioli and Baker is a bloody good backline.
Would be interesting but no.Grimesy at Full Forward..YES!
Not this week.Seem to recall Carts suggesting Gibcus go forward
Maybe you’ve been talking to Josh?
It worked (sort of) with Luke McGuane (briefly)i cant see how a quality hard running, gutsy defender who is equally adept at playing small or tall, while intercepting and providing link up play from defence could ever be redundant. 4 Nathan Broads alongside 1 Noah Balta and 1 Dan Rioli would be the perfect backline.
i wouldnt move him, but maybe the MC thinks those qualities will translate into a useful 3rd forward.
Yeh, Broad's been an improver since his first year and is ultra reliable now. To call him redundant is ridiculous. With the gang back together I'm much more confident of our 2022 prospects. Remove Broad and you remove a very important cog IMO.i cant see how a quality hard running, gutsy defender who is equally adept at playing small or tall, while intercepting and providing link up play from defence could ever be redundant. 4 Nathan Broads alongside 1 Noah Balta and 1 Dan Rioli would be the perfect backline.
i wouldnt move him, but maybe the MC thinks those qualities will translate into a useful 3rd forward.
I think they wanted to limit his calamitous damage. It couldn't be avoided even in the forward line.It worked (sort of) with Luke McGuane (briefly)
I think they wanted to limit his calamitous damage. It couldn't be avoided even in the forward line.
Can never grow tired of that footage.
*smile* me!I think they wanted to limit his calamitous damage. It couldn't be avoided even in the forward line.
Can never grow tired of that footage.
Best in the AFL. Easily.I'd leave the back 7 as is - Grimes, Balta, Gibcus, Broad, Vlastuin, Rioli and Baker is a bloody good backline.
McGuane's best move at Richmond was moving his gear from his locker to his carIt worked (sort of) with Luke McGuane (briefly)
the 1st one was a mistake anyone could make- forgetting to kick over the defender in front. he probably should have known better than attempting for a left foot drop kick though.I think they wanted to limit his calamitous damage. It couldn't be avoided even in the forward line.
Can never grow tired of that footage.
That could happen to anyone.I think they wanted to limit his calamitous damage. It couldn't be avoided even in the forward line.
Can never grow tired of that footage.
Mansell,s hard running and tackling might just be what we needMansell?
Our forward pressure has slowly but surely dropped off from its 2017 heights, bill. Towner went out, Higlet replaced Butler, Lynch came in, Aarts came in, Daniel moved to defence. Bit by bit, then all of a sudden we couldn't get a hand on the bad guys in our F50.C çc
Mansell,s hard running and tackling might just be what we need