I'm only a bit sad that we didn't get better value out of the Saints and make a competitor pay a high price for a player they obviously believe makes them better. I would have done that deal with a bottom feeder; not a top 4-6 club.sad to see him go.
Why use a first round on another small forward type when we had plenty. We loaded up on mids last year & need key forwards this year for a reason. Should have used that pick on one of those types.Agree. We need to get someone like David King into the club....he's always right (in hindsight!).
agree Lambie. Living in NSW it has always amazed me why some disgruntled AFL player (Dodo could be the catalyst) stops a player going to the club of choice and lands in the Federal Court blowing up the AFL draft and trading schemes as a restraint of trade. This happened in NSW some 20 years ago and why it is open season every year.I think we are more than happy with Dow and Ross as midfield anchors over the next decade. Jack will have a better career at Saints than with us. Actually quite astute by Higgins to leave now.
Fair call about the Richmond man.Lucky Pinjarra, Fridge and Caddyshack didn't throw the toys out of the cot after missing Grand Finals.
Simply put young Glacier Jack, they are Richmond men, and you are not!
go and "Support" someone else then, disrespectful ****Weak as P1ss
we are useless at the trade table. it’s already been stated by GC that Richmond are good to work with.
Its because we like to bend over and touch are toes.
What a waste of 3 years. Sorry but should not have picked him to start with.
Because recruiting for "those types" always work out when it comes to key forwards. I couldnt be bothered going back and checking who was available and then asking the club whether he was a *smile* or not and if not why didn't you recruit him. It is what it is. Take pick 17 and a future second rounder and move on (and watch the GF replay again).Why use a first round on another small forward type when we had plenty. We loaded up on mids last year & need key forwards this year for a reason. Should have used that pick on one of those types.
Me too. As long as we pick up someone at pick 17 that ends up a much better player than pick 21.Im happy with that
He is either slow' and therefore a future round 2 pick is overs, or he is not slow, in which case we should hold the line on a 1st?
No one is giving us a 1st round pick for a small player with questionable skills, no leg speed and with a serious recent medical issue.
*smile* me a lot - really lousy deal when he's a contracted player. Pretty pissed TBHBig time.
Hard to complain after 3 flags in 4 years, but this sort of stuff *smile* me a little bit.
Agree. Think we got unders too.So effectively we got him for a future 2nd rounder. Which most likely will be in the 30's.
Unders.