When it comes to trading players everyone thinks we are soft, and it has become a problem.
We have a very useful player and he is valued by the coach who brought him back and then persevered, until injury forced him out.
No loss of face for Jack in that.
As in a previous post I think St Kilda’s future 1st should be the objective.
Don’t mind if we throw in our future 3rd or even the pick we got for Markov, but we should not bend further.
It’s all very well for Jack to call the coach and list manager personally to put his case. Sweet really but also strategic by the Saints and Jacks management, who should also be made aware that we are not going to give up quality without appropriate compensation.
Should this not get done and should he then not be renewed for what ever reason for 2022, time for his manager, to understand that if necessary, we will make a point of sending him to the draft.
We have a reputation for being fair and that’s a grand thing but part of that requires us to be firm. IIt is in everyone’s interest that we be that now.
If Saad is worth more than pick 8 and Fantasia is also a first round pick then how is Jack Higgins virtually a second round future pick.? BS
Reckon thats about right for a dealword around the traps is its done and clubs have agreed apparently.
Not 100% but looking like #21+Higgins for #17+2021 2nd rounder
not 100% though
Nah. That's just basically Higgins for a late second rounder. Could be anywhere in the 30s if the Saints continue on the current trajectory. The minor pick upgrade is negligible. Pick 17 will end up somewhere in the mid 20s after all the academy *smile* picks this year.Reckon thats about right for a deal
Reckon thats about right for a deal
Lousy deal.Reckon thats about right for a deal
Horrible deal. Effectively giving him up for a second round pick - lets say pick 30.word around the traps is its done and clubs have agreed apparently.
Not 100% but looking like #21+Higgins for #17+2021 2nd rounder
not 100% though
I don’t think the club believes he will dislodge anyone either, hence they are prepared to swap him for picks.Personally i see it that he doesnt have the confidence in his ability to dislodge anybody from the starting 22 and probably feels the only games he will get is if there are injuries and he see's his main opposition in Ross , Rcd , Dow , Ralph-smith and thinks these guys are pretty good and its going to be hard to get in and stay in.
Unless we get a 1st rounder we keep as his value is not going to get any lower and he can provide depth
I am annoyed about getting unders in this trade so I am prob grumpy already.
It does not feel like a football decision does it?Without knowing the details it's hard not to suspect the failure lies with Higgins, given his apparent different attitude to other young players and the club's overwhelming success. Hopefully he issues a statement that provides some answers to supporters, otherwise he will leave without the goodwill of an Ellis or a Butler.
It didn't look like a football issue thats for sure.having said that, I found it strange he lost his spot. I thought he was our most consistent and hardest running small forward in the first half of the season.
I couldn't really see what he did wrong?