Baloo said:Judging by the true litmus test of PRE, the Ben Cousins trade has must be considered a very good one.
Other than commenting on the rabble that stormed the Punt Road Bastille yesterday, I haven't seen much of a comment from Diggler and Laff.
the claw said:well said talon whats good for one is good for the other. i have a feeling it wont take long before the deck of cards collapses.
Freezer said:They can't be on-line at the same time as Claw and Talon.
ha its typical rfc speak the constant undervaluing of draft picks.skiptomystu said:I await claw's response to this fantastic post.
Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha, ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!Ian4 said:Q: What does a Tasmanian Virgin and the RFC have in common?
A: They are both going to be f***ed by cousins
Pretty funny Ian4headsIan4 said:Q: What does a Tasmanian Virgin and the RFC have in common?
A: They are both going to be f***ed by cousins
Nah, barely and to be fair!wammo said:Weird!
Are you a Richmond supporter?
Why would you hope that?
I don't understand why you support (or pretend to) this club. Without exception, every post I've ever read from you is negative. I've been following this club for over 30 years. I'm also a realist and have been extremely critical of the club in terms of recruitment, player development, coaching and off-field management (especially financial) over the last 10-15 years in particular. This club should be far greater now than what it is. We were in every sense key rivals with Collingwood and Carlton in the 70's and early 80's, but lost our way while Essendon and teh Interstate clubs went past us.the claw said:ha its typical rfc speak the constant undervaluing of draft picks.
a list of players at the club that needs replacing plus old timers. old timers first.
cousins hes not even at the club yet but hes in delist calculations.
johnson say no more
richardson
brown
simmonds
bowden
tuck
pettifer
coughlan
mcmahon
polak
schulz
king
jackson
raines
polo
pattison
allowing the first 6 are gone over the next few yrs the players after them are all ordinary sheesh pettifer cogs and polak could all be gone already thru crippling injury.
what the hell are we doing chasing 31 yr olds with a list like this. if nothing else the rfc have totally abandoned a youth policy for a quick fix. they want to hope they make finals or some real questions will be asked of the rabble.
Tigers2011 said:I don't understand why you support (or pretend to) this club. Without exception, every post I've ever read from you is negative. I've been following this club for over 30 years. I'm also a realist and have been extremely critical of the club in terms of recruitment, player development, coaching and off-field management (especially financial) over the last 10-15 years in particular. This club should be far greater now than what it is. We were in every sense key rivals with Collingwood and Carlton in the 70's and early 80's, but lost our way while Essendon and teh Interstate clubs went past us.
However in a number of areas this club is now improving. For a start, the club is now profitable and hopefully the debt will be decreasing. With better finances come more resources to improve the key operational areas of the club (as mentioned above). Miller is gone and while I have some doubts about Cameron, at least the right types of players were recruited in the recent drafting period. My perception is that we now have an improved list, and it's incumbent on Wallace to get the best out of them. Our results will dictate his future and so be it.
Not every player on a list can be/is a champion - the salary cap alone sees to that. While Johnson has probably gone on one year too long and I'm also no fan of Pettifer and McMahon, by and large the player list has improved significantly. It does have youth and structured balance (see Phantom's recent post). The older players you list all still have on-field value, while many of the younger ones either haven't been given sufficient opportunity or have been set-back by injury. Polak's had an unfortunate accident while Coughlan is a super player badly affected by footy related injuries.
As members and supporters, it's our role to support the club financially and emotionally, and influence continued on and off-field improvement as much as we can so that we can gain maximum enjoyment for ourselves and have a better club to hand on to our kids and the next generation of Tiger supporters. We certainly have the right to criticise when the club is not pursuing the correct path and there's been many times when I've felt the need to do that. However at the end of the day, for this club to be successful and become what we all want it to be, we've got to get behind it.
Life is short. None of us can ever undo the mistakes that we've made today. We can only learn from them and do better tomorrow. This club has made many mistakes over the past 25 years, some because we followed the old, outdated model of the 70's when it was successful. I would hope that these lessons have been well and truly learnt and we can now re-build it bit by bit. Constant negativity, without any reasoned balance, will get this club nowhere.
Debate and constructively question all aspects of the club as much as you like. Done in the right way, that can be very valuable. Being negative just for the sake ot it is a waste of time.
Tigers2011 said:I don't understand why you support (or pretend to) this club. Without exception, every post I've ever read from you is negative. I've been following this club for over 30 years. I'm also a realist and have been extremely critical of the club in terms of recruitment, player development, coaching and off-field management (especially financial) over the last 10-15 years in particular. This club should be far greater now than what it is. We were in every sense key rivals with Collingwood and Carlton in the 70's and early 80's, but lost our way while Essendon and teh Interstate clubs went past us.
However in a number of areas this club is now improving. For a start, the club is now profitable and hopefully the debt will be decreasing. With better finances come more resources to improve the key operational areas of the club (as mentioned above). Miller is gone and while I have some doubts about Cameron, at least the right types of players were recruited in the recent drafting period. My perception is that we now have an improved list, and it's incumbent on Wallace to get the best out of them. Our results will dictate his future and so be it.
Not every player on a list can be/is a champion - the salary cap alone sees to that. While Johnson has probably gone on one year too long and I'm also no fan of Pettifer and McMahon, by and large the player list has improved significantly. It does have youth and structured balance (see Phantom's recent post). The older players you list all still have on-field value, while many of the younger ones either haven't been given sufficient opportunity or have been set-back by injury. Polak's had an unfortunate accident while Coughlan is a super player badly affected by footy related injuries.
As members and supporters, it's our role to support the club financially and emotionally, and influence continued on and off-field improvement as much as we can so that we can gain maximum enjoyment for ourselves and have a better club to hand on to our kids and the next generation of Tiger supporters. We certainly have the right to criticise when the club is not pursuing the correct path and there's been many times when I've felt the need to do that. However at the end of the day, for this club to be successful and become what we all want it to be, we've got to get behind it.
Life is short. None of us can ever undo the mistakes that we've made today. We can only learn from them and do better tomorrow. This club has made many mistakes over the past 25 years, some because we followed the old, outdated model of the 70's when it was successful. I would hope that these lessons have been well and truly learnt and we can now re-build it bit by bit. Constant negativity, without any reasoned balance, will get this club nowhere.
Debate and constructively question all aspects of the club as much as you like. Done in the right way, that can be very valuable. Being negative just for the sake ot it is a waste of time.
Col.W.Kurtz said:I so, so hope he is fit for round one.
Freezer said:There is no chance Cousins won't play round 1. Home game v Carlton and Judd - I may just fly home for that one!
Freezer said:There is no chance Cousins won't play round 1. Home game v Carlton and Judd - I may just fly home for that one!