Another matter is this idea that we’re in the throes of change – not just to a new generation of player but to a new “switchy’ style of play. Meaning that defensively, at least, we play a type of positionless style of game. With the ability to switch off opponents when defending top of the key screen and rolls, pop-outs and low post pin – downs.
If that is the case – why did we take Kay and Reath at all? Sure, a defence employing those guys can stall the offensive motion by utilising jump switches, blitzes and drop backs when the initial triple threat is neutralised – but that’s old school – it’s not really employing a switchy defence at all. And you can’t half do it. It only works when everyone is capable of switching all the time.
To truly benefit from this style we would have been better taking Maker or Pinder – centres with genuine foot speed and juice. And possibly even Froling – who has shown a very good transition / open court game in the international lead-up games he played for the Boomers. In fact – he was the only big really running the floor. Switchy defence requires great speed and skill in transitioning to offense to make it really pay off.
I can’t help feeling that the intention was right but that the selection of personnel was off the mark. It relegated the employment of the switchy defense to the second string team only – where Cooks and to a lesser extent White could be used to any effect.
In short, we didn’t really carry that idea through to the point where our identity as a team and style of play evolved to truly create something new. We were a bit of this and a bit of that – and no amount of warm-up games or time playing together was going to fix it. We need to choose the right team to employ this style of play and go from there.