Djevv said:I acknowledge that much evil has been done in Christs name. You have got to realise that some organisation, acting in Christ's name, is not nessecarily doing Gods will. Jesus didn't come to Earth to start a religion.
However, I think if you are going to be fair, you must acknowledge that in European history, Christianity has been a civilising influence. Also that the Church often stood up to the worst excesses of tyrannical governments.
On the first point, I thought the Catholic church uses the Bible (don't know exact) to show that their church (as the church of Peter) has a mandate from Jesus. Don't know the precise details, just recall reading it previously.
On the second, to some extent. That "civilization" only came at a pretty high price for the masses (church demanded its tithe, and their fuedal master got the rest. Also if you study papal history, you will find they ironically tended to support the tyrannical leaders, and were usually one themselves. They tended to support whoever looked after them best financially, and the number of wars the Vatican razed it actually quite funny. Since the modern area, especially when the Papal States lost most of their territory to the newly created Kingdom of Italy, I agree things have changed a lot.
Djevv said:OK, agreed, but while Atheism avoids the worst excesses of religion, it has, of itself, no moral imperative. This is why the Athiest governments (and I include Hitler in this), when they became tyrannies, had nothing to restrain them.
Hitler was a very proud Christian, and had a degree of Papal support. He was a madman, but you cannot consider him an athiest.
**EDIT***
Just been doing some Googling. Seems while Hitler was "an admirer of Jesus" he had a number of rants against Christianity. A lot of the sites carry agendas one way or the other, so trying to look through them with the bias removed is a tad painful. Having had only a cursory glace, I would say Hitler considered himself a Christian, but hated the powerbase Christianity provided the churches - he was a meglomaniac after all.
I should also not one thing I forgot in the original post. Even if he was acting as a Christian, its absurd to say his acts were in line with any fair teaching of Christ.