TigerMasochist said:Watched the game live and didn't think Rancealot did much wrong, watched the replay and he actually had a fairly good game. Defended hard, ran to link and his disposal was fairly good.
goose said:Simply not up to it. No awareness.
Tigerbob said:Only once was that the case and when Eddie Betts comes out of nowhere I ask anyone to see it coming!
He was very good was Rance, people need to take another look at the game.
goose said:Have to agree to disagree - unfortunately I am sick and taped the game and watched it again - he didn't get any better. The days of playing league footy because you are hard at it and have a go are gone. Would have been a ripper in the 70's and 80's. Game doesn't suit him anymore.
Tigerbob said:The fact people still say he only possesses hardness means they are not paying attention. 21 year old KPP developing well, should be appreciated and supported, not be cast aside as a dud. He was good against Carlton.
Def need to watch the replay Maleny, Rancealot was nowhere near as bad as some are pretending. Think to many were expecting him to become elite within his first season on the list.MalenyTiger said:I am not one to call players duds and am usually more hopeful than pessimistic about player development but I do have concerns about Rance. My recollection of the game is that he got plenty of it but put other players under pressure with his disposal by both hand and foot and just didn't seem to have any idea of where to go when he got the ball. Granted, I haven't seen the replay yet so he may have done some good things that I missed. I'm only going on what I saw. Hopefully he will improve but ATM his deficiencies are in areas that are not easily rectified.