I hate the 'Richmond Man' label, it's as meaningless as the term 'un-Australian', plenty of hubris and attempts to project the club as the demigods of player management (which we are not!) Sydney Stack a case in point, when he's firing he's a 'Richmond Man', when he's off the rails he's someone else's problem. Let's just stick to 'good character' as boring as it sounds.
I hate unaustralian, but love Richmond Man.
Although if we are serious about inclusivity,
It should be Richmond Person.
If we recruited jordan degoey, wed just have to explain why he can play for us without being a Richmond Person.
I think Stackman keeps his richmond man title. Its a family and it unconditional - you dont generally recind a childs surname when they *smile* up.
You have to create and build organisational culture,
And as jingoistic as it may feel,
Youve gotta foster belonging and ownership etc,
And good character doesnt cut it.
but i hear you and get it. Ive fought with it myself and lost. I usually contradict my core belief systems whenit comes to footy and racehorses
I always hate when sportpeople have a great victory and thanks God, because of the implication that God clearly deserted their opponent.
Same but different
And yes, Cotchy is to Richmond Man, what an ameoba is to kelly slater