Marshall didn't use a high tech gun or a 22. He only owned a glock. Those things are loud - especially in the middle of the night. Even if the wind was blowing (which no one mentions and is quite rare at night) the noise would be carried to neighbours downwind of Marshall's house. You try firing a glock inside an insulated house with trees around it and tell me you can't hear it inside neighbouring houses. I'll guarantee that once you've tried you'll realise why such an assertion is indeed ridiculous. 4 shots as well remember.
Madsen states that the houses where Marshall lived are "right on top of eachother". The official report says they're well separated. Someone is lying and there's got to be a good chance whoever that is is doing it because they have alterior motives.
Yeah nah. I just thought we could discuss the case here in a rational manner. Cest la vie.
Where exactly in the links you provided does the coroner say it was a murder/suicide? Why would the coroner even make such a statement?
What exactly did that person hear? How could he possibly know if it was Marshall killlng his kids and then himself rather than other people killng all of them? You may see these points as deliciously ironic but that says more about your inability to view things objectively than anything else.
The police seem negligent because they have concluded the case without toxicology or GSR reports. They also present no motive and seemingly ignore reports that none of Marshall's neighbours reported hearing gunshots. Why not wait until all the evidence has been examined before laying blame? If there's conclusive evidence that Marshall murdered his children why isn't it being presented?
The evidence Madsen presented is compelling enough to question the official reports. Neighbours apparently all believe Marshall and his children were murdered by outside parties. None of them heard gunshots. Someone reported that the crime scene was "illegally cleaned" - presumably before being investigated. You'd have to have your head well and truly up your arse to not be able to see the implications of these reports. At the very leasy they need to be investigated further and explained.
Every person is deserving of the right to innocence until they're proven guilty. Even truthers.
No. The police haven't released those details even though they've stated definitively that Marshall murdered his children. Why?
Marshall's entire history of violence extends to one instance of slapping his wife (from memory). Murdering your own kids is a long way from that.
What evidence is there that Marshall was mentally unstable?
What was it exactly about the JFK and LHO references that caused you to question Madsen's credibility again?
Madsen states that the houses where Marshall lived are "right on top of eachother". The official report says they're well separated. Someone is lying and there's got to be a good chance whoever that is is doing it because they have alterior motives.
tigertim said:The irony is delicious Disco. In other posts you've made you trumpet how people hearing "explosions" is somehow proof that wtc 7 was detonated for explosion, yet here someone hears sometihng and it proves nothing.
I don't have access to the police files to know all the details to know what information they compiled to come to the conclusion that he was guilty. And neither do you, you have some scant details from the internet. But from that you deduce that the police have been negligent?
And to describe what you've posted as "evidence that contradicts the official report" is yet another example of your delusions. What "evidence"? Neighbours saying he wasnt the type to kill? No motive? How do you know there wasn't a motive? If you've read so many crime boooks you'll know there's so much more to these cases than just the scant details released. And why do police have to release these detials? To suit you? Maybe his impending divorce was a factor? Maybe his seperation? There were domestic violence issues before. But most of all he was a truther and we all know their mental health isn't too stable!
The opinion of the coroner is that it was a murder suicide, you seem to be saying otherwise.
Anyway, enough from me. I suppose if you're so worried that an innocent man has been found to have murdered his kids then you probably should contact Calveras county pd and alert them with your "evidence".
Yeah nah. I just thought we could discuss the case here in a rational manner. Cest la vie.
Where exactly in the links you provided does the coroner say it was a murder/suicide? Why would the coroner even make such a statement?
What exactly did that person hear? How could he possibly know if it was Marshall killlng his kids and then himself rather than other people killng all of them? You may see these points as deliciously ironic but that says more about your inability to view things objectively than anything else.
The police seem negligent because they have concluded the case without toxicology or GSR reports. They also present no motive and seemingly ignore reports that none of Marshall's neighbours reported hearing gunshots. Why not wait until all the evidence has been examined before laying blame? If there's conclusive evidence that Marshall murdered his children why isn't it being presented?
The evidence Madsen presented is compelling enough to question the official reports. Neighbours apparently all believe Marshall and his children were murdered by outside parties. None of them heard gunshots. Someone reported that the crime scene was "illegally cleaned" - presumably before being investigated. You'd have to have your head well and truly up your arse to not be able to see the implications of these reports. At the very leasy they need to be investigated further and explained.
Every person is deserving of the right to innocence until they're proven guilty. Even truthers.
antman said:No probs... but I can diss VT if you want!
Just having a quick look through it, some good stuff about the experiences and health issues of the vets and the human costs of the war mostly for power elites and money. But of course it gets intertwined with anti Israel propaganda, 911, the Illuminati and so on and so forth.
Anything is possible. But a guy murdering his own family (and dog) with his own gun is unfortunately much more common in the US than being murdered by (a) a complete stranger or (b) black ops hit squads. Given the family history, and allusions to possible mental illness, this becomes even more likely. As for the local cops covering up for the Feds, don't believe it for one second based on the info I've seen.
I don't know what procedures they performed on the crime scene, and in terms of the autopsies. I just can't tell from here. Can you?
No. The police haven't released those details even though they've stated definitively that Marshall murdered his children. Why?
Marshall's entire history of violence extends to one instance of slapping his wife (from memory). Murdering your own kids is a long way from that.
What evidence is there that Marshall was mentally unstable?
What was it exactly about the JFK and LHO references that caused you to question Madsen's credibility again?