911 Truth Movement

[Baloo]

Pffft. You want me to ring him and question his credentials? LMFAO.

You're the one trying to discredit the official report, not me. Of you cant be bothered to try and establish some facts into your claims then it just adds to the overwhelming evidence, proof and fact that troofers are on a par with creationists when it comes credibility.

Btw, pfftt and LMFAO in a one line reply and then you question my maturity in posting ? Good one.

 

[tigertim]

Yeah. I'm just a know-nothing talking through his arse after all.

See, you can e objective! Well done.

 

[Disco08]

You're the one trying to discredit the official report, not me. Of you cant be bothered to try and establish some facts into your claims then it just adds to the overwhelming evidence, proof and fact that troofers are on a par with creationists when it comes credibility.

Btw, pfftt and LMFAO in a one line reply and then you question my maturity in posting ? Good one.

Well it was a pretty dumb line of critisism.

There's enough in Madsen's report to discredit the official report. Shame we can't discuss it maturely.

 

[Baloo]

Well it was a pretty dumb line of critisism.

There's enough in Madsen's report to discredit the official report. Shame we can't discuss it maturely.

It's only dumb when you say so I see. And that only happens when you're called out on something you struggle to defend. Lets put down your use of his mates thoughts down as another throw away line shall we. That will allow you to feign indignation if anyone ever mentions it again.

 

[tigersnake]

Don't stop beleivin'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcjzHMhBtf0

 

[tigertim]

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/13/us/christopher-dorner-profile

An article on a chris Dorner. He had friends, colleagues and neighbours speak well of him. As it says n the opening paragraph, "it's a common refrain from neighbours and friends after someone try know is accused in a mass shooting or other horrific crime: "he was such a nice guy, he was so quiet, I can't belive he'd do something like this"

But apparently in the the world of the theorist it's some sort of proof that the murderer couldn't commit murder. Delusional, simpy delusional.

 

[tigersnake]

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/13/us/christopher-dorner-profile

An article on a chris Dorner. He had friends, colleagues and neighbours speak well of him. As it says n the opening paragraph, "it's a common refrain from neighbours and friends after someone try know is accused in a mass shooting or other horrific crime: "he was such a nice guy, he was so quiet, I can't belive he'd do something like this"

But apparently in the the world of the theorist it's some sort of proof that the murderer couldn't commit murder. Delusional, simpy delusional.

I actually saw a stand up comedian do a whole routine around the 'he was a nice man, a quiet man', eyewitness cliche after a serial killer is captured

 

[Disco08]

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/13/us/christopher-dorner-profile

An article on a chris Dorner. He had friends, colleagues and neighbours speak well of him. As it says n the opening paragraph, "it's a common refrain from neighbours and friends after someone try know is accused in a mass shooting or other horrific crime: "he was such a nice guy, he was so quiet, I can't belive he'd do something like this"

But apparently in the the world of the theorist it's some sort of proof that the murderer couldn't commit murder. Delusional, simpy delusional.

That's not the only line of objection you realise tim.

Can you find me an example of a little league coach murdering his children?

It's only dumb when you say so I see. And that only happens when you're called out on something you struggle to defend. Lets put down your use of his mates thoughts down as another throw away line shall we. That will allow you to feign indignation if anyone ever mentions it again.

How exactly would you expect me to know what Marshall's friend's qualifications in psychology are?

 

[tigersnake]

Can you find me an example of a little league coach murdering his children?

Nope, now you're just taking the p!ss Disco. On so many levels.

 

[Disco08]

Why? Plenty of serial killers/mass murderers are quiet. How many devoted parents who coach their kid's little league team murder all their children? Apples and apples. Not apples and grapfruit.

 

[tigertim]

That's not the only line of objection you realise tim.

Can you find me an example of a little league coach murdering his children?

Yes I do Dancer but you're not interested in mature rational discussion of this topic.

So what are you saying now Dancer, a little league coach couldn't possibly kill? You are a funny guy Dancer, a very funny guy.

 

[Disco08]

I've been trying for months to have a rational and mature discussion on any topic involving 9/11.

 

[Baloo]

That's not the only line of objection you realise tim.

Can you find me an example of a little league coach murdering his children?

How exactly would you expect me to know what Marshall's friend's qualifications in psychology are?

I would expect anyone serious about a supposed coverup by multiple government agencies validate the expert knowledge of your witnesses if you intend to use them to discredit the official report.

If you have no idea of his qualifications, why use his views on Marshall's state of mind as an indicator that the official report is discredited. Unless it was just another throw away line of course....

 

[tigersnake]

Why? Plenty of serial killers/mass murderers are quiet. How many devoted parents who coach their kid's little league team murder all their children? Apples and apples. Not apples and grapfruit.

I'm genuinely nonplussed by this

 

[Baloo]

I've been trying for months to have a rational and mature discussion on any topic involving 9/11.

So have we but all we're met with is indignation, mock disbelief, petulance and derision when we don't agree with the troofers view of things.

 

[Disco08]

Please. You're going to tell me that you've all been repsectful and mature and I've been rude and dishonest?

I'm genuinely nonplussed by this

Why?

I would expect anyone serious about a supposed coverup by multiple government agencies validate the expert knowledge of your witnesses if you intend to use them to discredit the official report.

If you have no idea of his qualifications, why use his views on Marshall's state of mind as an indicator that the official report is discredited. Unless it was just another throw away line of course....

His "qaulification" is that he was Marshall's friend and as such was able to give insight into his temperament. Why you feel he needs to have a degree in psychology to do so is beyond me.

 

[Baloo]

How would he know if someone, friend or not, is capable of murder suicide if he isn't an expert in psychology ?

If he's just giving an uninformed opinion after the event, then fine, he's within his rights to do so, but please don't try and pass it off as more reason to discredit the official report.

 

[tigertim]

So Dancer, where is your objectivity in validating his friends opinion but not his ex wife's? There's no objectivity from you on this.

I know you're going to say his ex wife is not someone who's opinion to take into account but tats just because t doesn't fit into your argument. By the same token then be couldn't take his neighbours positive account because he like Marshall.

 

[Baloo]

Please. You're going to tell me that you've all been repsectful and mature and I've been rude and dishonest?

I missed this. For the most part, absolutely. It only turned into a farce when you started acting like anyone who didn't believe your view on events was either stupid, brain dead, deliberately being closed minded or accepting of anything the authorities dish out all the while scampering and running whenever someone tried to nail you down on one of your facts.

If the debate has become a farce, you only have yourself to blame for it.

 

[Disco08]

Fair enough. Feel free to post a few examples and in the next few days I'll do the same.

So Dancer, where is your objectivity in validating his friends opinion but not his ex wife's? There's no objectivity from you on this.

I know you're going to say his ex wife is not someone who's opinion to take into account but tats just because t doesn't fit into your argument. By the same token then be couldn't take his neighbours positive account because he like Marshall.

Friends would seem to be more likely to be honest about Marshall than a bitter ex wife.

How would he know if someone, friend or not, is capable of murder suicide if he isn't an expert in psychology ?

If he's just giving an uninformed opinion after the event, then fine, he's within his rights to do so, but please don't try and pass it off as more reason to discredit the official report.

Some people find this type of testimony meaningful in these type of cases. Just because you don't means nothing and I'll post as I please.