Ken Hinkley has built a very good list, maybe lacking something on match days but cannot fault the types he has brought to the club. I think Port are a very good case study as to how a club should refit a midfield & get the appropriate tall timber in place. Might also be an opening there to get a surplus player if Marshall & Georgiades wind up competing for one spot.
Yep, I think we need to go back to finding a coach of the same profile Hinkley or Hardwick were when they started.
Would the revamp include fitness staff?
My personal view is the angst about our fitness staff is overblown.
There's very little between any AFL players in terms of the physiological markers of their fitness capacity relative to their capability.
The difference really comes from within, the desire to push yourself into what is uncomfortable and how long you are prepared to suffer. It's motivation and desire, not fitness and winners always look fitter than losers for that very reason.
To convince 2 quality players to come to Richmond when they had other options only to put them up for trade 12 months later would rightfully make us a laughing stock and undo all the good work Benny, Peggy, Balmy and Dimma have done to regain the respect of the AFL community.
People said that about Collingwood with Treloar, Grundy etc.... Not sure anyone is laughing now.
If you accept that you have made significant errors in the management of your list it requires significant measures to rectify that. History shows the best way to build a successful list is with low draft picks and Taranto and Hopper are two of very few players on our list that hold that currency, and who aren't likely to be big players in our next success.