He's a good player Lalor but I don't get the lack of scrutiny and risk management assessment, and the accompanying value that comes with that assessment.
There's nothing that tells me that Lalor is soooo much better than FOS or Jagga or maybe even Langford and Draper that he just simply has to be taken at 1. Then, you add in a number of soft tissue injuries (one of them serious) and not coming back in great shape from any of them, plus questions around his endurance levels, and Lalor blows out to a value of about pick 6 or 7 to me.
If we keep 6, then personally I prefer FOS or Jagga at 1 over Lalor. And if that means missing out on Lalor and its a FOS/Jagga + Langford/Draper scenario, then I'm 100% ok with that.
There's nothing that tells me that Lalor is soooo much better than FOS or Jagga or maybe even Langford and Draper that he just simply has to be taken at 1. Then, you add in a number of soft tissue injuries (one of them serious) and not coming back in great shape from any of them, plus questions around his endurance levels, and Lalor blows out to a value of about pick 6 or 7 to me.
If we keep 6, then personally I prefer FOS or Jagga at 1 over Lalor. And if that means missing out on Lalor and its a FOS/Jagga + Langford/Draper scenario, then I'm 100% ok with that.