Was he a leaper though? i suppose in spurts, he did have some stints up forward.We are savagely forgetting the athlete Deledio was. Close to the best physically build and profile I’ve seen on a midfielder.
Was he a leaper though? i suppose in spurts, he did have some stints up forward.We are savagely forgetting the athlete Deledio was. Close to the best physically build and profile I’ve seen on a midfielder.
Thanks, @spook. This is what we're having trouble nailing down.Adelaide at 4 or Melbourne at 5. Dees like Smith or Langford is my mail from someone at another club.
Thanks, @spook. This is what we're having trouble nailing down.
Interesting that you've got Smith linked to MFC. And Langford to ADEL.
Twomey knows there are two clubs for Smith. He'll be right.
You got any idea who Carl-you-see-how-you-scum want at #3 if FOS is gone?
Nothing with Carlton. I’m not ruling at Norf taking FOS at 2.Thanks, @spook. This is what we're having trouble nailing down.
Interesting that you've got Smith linked to MFC. And Langford to ADEL.
Twomey knows there are two clubs for Smith. He'll be right.
You got any idea who Carl-you-see-how-you-scum want at #3 if FOS is gone?
Smillie copped a media ban after meeting Carlton, could be some smoke coming from that direction.Nothing with Carlton. I’m not ruling at Norf taking FOS at 2.
Can he win enough ball though.I reckon O'Sullivan has a better leap than Deledio, he's closer to Heeney.
Yes, SteeDz. We all think Carl-you-see-how-you-scum must go for overlap between their current established finals squad and a new star.They probably don't want Smith as he's another Walsh - reckon they'll either want a point of difference to the mids they already have and preferably quicker (Draper) or if not, an eventual successor to Cripps. (Lalor, Smillie, Langford).
That's an interesting scenario, Bully. Throws everything out.Smillie copped a media ban after meeting Carlton, could be some smoke coming from that direction.
Good for Richmond and more incentive to get pick 2, much better chance to land Langford.That's an interesting scenario, Bully. Throws everything out.
There's some risk but he did have a good year in 2023, small sample size this year however, I think these types of picks can make you look foolish if you land a Fiora or Tambling but I think O'Sullivan is much better on the inside than those two.Can he win enough ball though.
Will we taking many/ any in the rookie draft ?Talking about KPF
I noticed there is absolutely no talk about Charlie Richardson the grandson of KB
Looks he might drop tp the Rookie draft
Wouldnt mind him as a developing KPF on the rookie list
He did play well in the ruck then, even competed well with Gawn for a half but tired.I haven't lost all hope for Samson yet. He actually played a couple of pretty good games in a row in 2023 when Nanks was injured and he played primary ruck. But we've spent alot of time when Nanks is playing turning him into a key forward. Has only played 23 games. Needs a decent stint in the ruck and it's time Nanks gave ua bit of ruck time for the cause I think.
Definitely needs to hold his ground better imho Sin , big summer at KFC and on the leg pressHe did play well in the ruck then, even competed well with Gawn for a half but tired.
He has to mark the ball, that’s the big issue. Those cymbal hands have to be fixed for him to make it as a ruck and I losing hope, and I was a fan.
Hope he has Heeney’s hands in a marking contest as well. Lids had hands like a vice as well.I reckon O'Sullivan has a better leap than Deledio, he's closer to Heeney.
This is what happens when football isn’t around. We get silly. Good reminder.I haven't lost all hope for Samson yet. He actually played a couple of pretty good games in a row in 2023 when Nanks was injured and he played primary ruck. But we've spent alot of time when Nanks is playing turning him into a key forward. Has only played 23 games. Needs a decent stint in the ruck and it's time Nanks gave ua bit of ruck time for the cause I think.