11 pieces? I reckon that was the entree. That place had some creatures in it, like the bar in Star Wars.That was an amazing place. My record was 11 pieces in one sit. I stacked on 21kg over 12 months going there.
Well, if the reports are correct (maybe...maybe not...sounds a bit fanciful) then yeah. I think I've gotta do it.
You move into 2 and get the front of the que tandem of your choice. How often does that happen ? And you maintain 10, 18, 23 and 24 in a very even draft. Then, you add say 1 and 5 (or so) next year, and in 2 drafts you've totally dominated matters and set the platform for the future with the best kids in the land.
The top 5 or so next year will have some guns beyond just Sharp eg Lindsay, Dalton, Onley, Greeves, Luds etc
Yeah, you'd have to do it.
It's getting to the point where we don't need to do this trade & giving anything else back. We have the picks & the flexibility so let's keep it that way. For an "offer too good to refuse" we'll consider it.I DONT BELIEVE THIS TRADE #6 + #10 FOR #2 + F1
There would have to be more for it and its way too 1 sided for Richmond
I do believe the conversation has taken place for #2 + F1 but not just for #6 + #10
It would have to include either our F2 or 1 of the later picks we have most likely #18
#1 , #2 , #10 , #20 , #23 would be taken this draft and #24 traded for F1 to another team most likely Essendon
above picks this year and 3 x 1st rounders next year is still a good 2 years of drafts with 8 1st rounders
But i would be pushing for F2 rather than #18
We all go through those types of phases, usually in our teens, you're just a late bloomer.I’m so confused
I’ve hooked up with @Harry.We all go through those types of phases, usually in our teens, you're just a late bloomer.
But it's OK, folks are much more open to alternative lifestyles nowadays. You do you, we'll all celebrate ya.
I would attempt to get pick 10 to at least pick 7, I think Smith falls in that region. Three midfielders looks like the best play with that remaining hand, although Travaglia is a decent contingency at pick 10.I DONT BELIEVE THIS TRADE #6 + #10 FOR #2 + F1
There would have to be more for it and its way too 1 sided for Richmond
I do believe the conversation has taken place for #2 + F1 but not just for #6 + #10
It would have to include either our F2 or 1 of the later picks we have most likely #18
#1 , #2 , #10 , #20 , #23 would be taken this draft and #24 traded for F1 to another team most likely Essendon
above picks this year and 3 x 1st rounders next year is still a good 2 years of drafts with 8 1st rounders
But i would be pushing for F2 rather than #18
It's getting to the point where we don't need to do this trade & giving anything else back. We have the picks & the flexibility so let's keep it that way. For an "offer too good to refuse" we'll consider it.
Old fart was thinking more along the lines of dart board, we've got lots of picks to throw n we're bound to hit something good. Gotta find me a way to get out of the dark ages sometime soon, obviously got no idea what you young ambidextrous people get up to these days.I’ve hooked up with @Harry.
We’re working things out
getting these two would be a good result
Agree with the f2 if its correct that next years draft is not as deep.I DONT BELIEVE THIS TRADE #6 + #10 FOR #2 + F1
There would have to be more for it and its way too 1 sided for Richmond
I do believe the conversation has taken place for #2 + F1 but not just for #6 + #10
It would have to include either our F2 or 1 of the later picks we have most likely #18
#1 , #2 , #10 , #20 , #23 would be taken this draft and #24 traded for F1 to another team most likely Essendon
above picks this year and 3 x 1st rounders next year is still a good 2 years of drafts with 8 1st rounders
But i would be pushing for F2 rather than #18
Wouldnt give 6 10 18 for lolnorf 2 F1 thats oversI DONT BELIEVE THIS TRADE #6 + #10 FOR #2 + F1
There would have to be more for it and its way too 1 sided for Richmond
I do believe the conversation has taken place for #2 + F1 but not just for #6 + #10
It would have to include either our F2 or 1 of the later picks we have most likely #18
#1 , #2 , #10 , #20 , #23 would be taken this draft and #24 traded for F1 to another team most likely Essendon
above picks this year and 3 x 1st rounders next year is still a good 2 years of drafts with 8 1st rounders
But i would be pushing for F2 rather than #18
Tauru & another tall. Tauru with 6 and another tall with our later pick. that my guess what North are chasing.
He actually reminds me of the late great Paul Couch. Very much a footballer, but his lack of pace worries me.Gez watched a bit of Langford smooth mover reminds me of Pendlebury from pies game stops when his got the ball.