I agree with Bill BungalBill Bungal from the Ballarat Beat has been consistently saying he's number 1. He's better than Twomey. You can trust him.
I agree with Bill BungalBill Bungal from the Ballarat Beat has been consistently saying he's number 1. He's better than Twomey. You can trust him.
Bill Bungal from the Ballarat Beat has been consistently saying he's number 1. He's better than Twomey. You can trust him.
It was on this thread, Bryan. Somebody (no names mentioned) posted Lalor favoured at #1 as a little bit of mail right here hours before Twomey tweeted it. Then another media outlet, say Fairfax. When was that? A week ago? A flurry. Twomey in it.Where's all the Lalor at 1 talk come from?
Twomey certainly hasn't marked it in. And he knows more than anyone outside club land.
Was wondering why you were so keen on him.Second cousin. Met him once at a family reunion.
It was on this thread, Bryan. Somebody (no names mentioned) posted Lalor favoured at #1 as a little bit of mail right here hours before Twomey tweeted it. Then another media outlet, say Fairfax. When was that? A week ago? A flurry. Twomey in it.
Since then there has been more mail/scuttlebutt around.
Lalor at #1? Not controversial at all. $1.35? $1.80? $1.15? He's short. It's possible you can't get on. I wouldn't lay it - this kind of market is dodgy at the best of times. People know. And they talk.
I am not Sam Walsh.Was wondering why you were so keen on him.
Blood thicker than water and all.
After pulling pick 14 for Baker. Who can question the Redman?Bill Bungal from the Ballarat Beat has been consistently saying he's number 1. He's better than Twomey. You can trust him.
WTF. You're not second cousins anymore?I am not Sam Walsh.
Ah, that would make spook pretty happy, Bryan.Fair enough.
Twomey today intimated it was still open and FoS can still go 1 is all.
Go back and read the post I was responding to and see if you can work it out.WTF. You're not second cousins anymore?
What was he doing at your family reunion? Handing around hors d'oeuvres?
Think it was obvious but half sounded like you were talking about yourself.Go back and read the post I was responding to and see if you can work it out.
Jagga at 6 is very very low odds. if that happens it will be christmas easter and NYE all in one!!!!Trading for 2 would be to add FOS to Lalor. (We're taking Lalor at 1.)
Good chance Jagga is there at 6.
Dusty was pick 3 so its more like Richard Lounder.Lalor going pick one & expected to be the "next Dusty" at Dusty's old club the year after Dusty retires - no pressure on the kid.
Dusty was pick 3 so its more like Richard Lounder.
So that's all of our remaining picks outside of the top 25 - if we do this then we're not getting 10 & 11 unless we give up a future pick.
Not sure of what you mean. Our remaining picks - the ones that have a point value attached - are 51, 61 and 70. The value of these three combined is sufficient to give The Suns enough points to match a bid on LombardSo that's all of our remaining picks outside of the top 25 - if we do this then we're not getting 10 & 11 unless we give up a future pick.
Ah, I'm talking bigger picture. You're right that we're giving up 51, 61 & 70, those are our last picks with value (outside of top 25), and that we're giving them to GCS along with Daniel for 6 & 23. My point is that doing will mean that we don't have any to give Freo besides Shai, and not having a sweatener will make it tough for us to get 10 & 11 from him.Not sure of what you mean. Our remaining picks - the ones that have a point value attached - are 51, 61 and 70. The value of these three combined is sufficient to give The Suns enough points to match a bid on Lombard