Ok I take your point on AS, and I'm not against LM, I'm warming to him, but to play the devils advocat, he has a touch of the Cleveland Steamers about him IMO. Very good at one thing, its a very good thing to be good at, but still, and he's not KF size.
I basically agree, but AS is next level in terms of accuracy along with the range, but that is at junior level. But yeah, you've convinced me, and the fact we already have Noah's long bombs seals it.
My point is Sicily didn't play like Sicily in his draft year either, he was developed into the player he is today.
Ha ha. I was jesting, but essentially they are/ were both lead-up mid sized fwds. I like Morris much more, not that I saw Cleve in jnrs, and his CMs are trmendous.
I'm a hard against. (that sounds a bit rude but I assure you I have only honourable intentions). Patrick Naish but with better PR.
Cleve was a very one dimensional lead up forward, he was born in the wrong decade and probably would have been successful in the eighties and early nineties.
My observation was Morris got better as the season progressed, often playing high up the ground and doing plenty of work between the arcs. He's closer to Josh Battle than Cleve Hughes and much more accomplished at ground level. I don't ever recall Hughes splitting packs or kicking majors once the aerial contest was nullified.
Hmmmm interesting. What was Schoenmakers vibrancy rating at the combine?
Other than Gibcus, which as a top 10 doesn't really count, the media hasn't had much of a clue about us over the last few drafts.
I agree mate need to get back to basics kicking needs to be a top priority. What's your take on Schoenmaker ? has alot of good traits.
