Re: Cousins: The poll. Do you want the Tigers to draft Ben Cousins?
Mate if he is there take him, no one else worth noting in the PSD
Mate if he is there take him, no one else worth noting in the PSD
hopper said:With all his problems and as a 29yo the answer's gotta be no. He could really do some damage among our young list.
hopper said:With all his problems and as a 29yo the answer's gotta be no. He could really do some damage among our young list.
Tiger74 said:polo said:I did not see the lions punishing aker running off at the mouth when they were winning flags. What cost wc this years was not drugs but cousins doing his hammy in the first final, and then no cousins kerr and judd in the final against collingwood
Big difference between having a mouth and loving the nose candy.
Cousins was dumped the first time because the drug use was effecting his training and disipline around the club.
Aka was just a pain in the ass.
Tygrys said:Let's see, a relapsed junkie, with a scandalous history of associating with shady characters and getting in trouble with the police?
Oh Richmonds sponsors would love that!!!
Why don't we make him captain whilst we're at it?
One of the reasons that the Weagles let him go was corporate heat...he was damaging the Eagle brand and all those associated with it.
So in sheer desperation for short term gain (and regardless of what some are arguing here by the time he is 'clean' he will be no spring chicken) some are willing to risk him.
Frankly this is someone that inspires no confidence. He appears to love playing with the underworld and what comes with it - it excites him, and he has no sense of responsibility. The bottom-line is could you trust him both as an addict and as a person to stay clean, to respect curfews, to keep away from bad elements and to keep his word?
Frankly there is nothing up to this point that would incline one to believe any of it. You might get some good games out of him - but what happens if he get's caught doing drugs again, or God forbid overdoses, or even dies (think his friend Chris Mainwaring!). What would it do to the Richmond brand name, how stupid and irresponsible would the club look, and how would the sponsors react? (and how would it affect our ability to gain additional sponsors?).
For those thinking because it might only cost Richmond a PSD or late draft pick it's a risk free gamble - think again - drafting Cousins would have potential disaster written all over it.
Redford said:jb03 said:The do gooders seem to be out and about again.
Has 5 years left in him, longer than will be the careers of major disapointments Meyer, JON and co at AFL level.
Just get him, and do something daring for a change.
Silly post. We dared to get Aaron James, Ben Marsh, Shane Morrison, Luke Weller etc. We've done plenty of daring things.
Growl said:Boy I've got to get myself a new dictionary if being against drugs is the definition of a 'do-gooder'.
So, ok, I'll put my hand up to being a do-gooder as I am definitely anti-drugs and I don't want that influence at Richmond.
It was bad enough this year reading posts about hoping we'd tank so we'd do better in the drafts but to read posters actually condoning drug-taking and thinking it can be managed - well, youre in a dream world.
And polo, you've made a couple of references to things at Richmond that I don't understand. Tell me, if we have a number of bad influences down there, what are they exactly? Please share them with us.
Tygrys said:...You might get some good games out of him - but what happens if he get's caught doing drugs again, or God forbid overdoses, or even dies (think his friend Chris Mainwaring!). What would it do to the Richmond brand name, how stupid and irresponsible would the club look, and how would the sponsors react? (and how would it affect our ability to gain additional sponsors?).
:roflDirtyDogTiger said:as true as all that is 8ball, he's no spring chicken and we have foley anyway. Maybe a ruckman, even a delisted one, would be the long term view
if we could get richards, bradley etc. playing well at least we could trading them next year
rinso17 said:Absolute no brainer YYYEEESSSS!!!
This is what clauses are all about in contracts. 1 breach, end of contract!
What the hell have we got to lose!! We've been last for 28 long bloody years!!
If he is able to remain true to his contract the upside is huge. If he doesnt we would have missed out on Frank Richards or whoever the hell he is from scumwood.