Tigers of Old said:Also I think our young side showed more passion without him there last week than with him there today. So go figure that.
rockstar_tiger said:I don't think our list is good enough to delist Ben yet.
Tigers of Old said:I couldn't say with confidence that he beat his opponent and despite his number of possessions I sat there thinking he's having little impact on the contest and still looks very slow.
I was actually very surprised to see his stats at game's end.
I'll no doubt cop flak from his numerous supporters but personally speaking if that's the best Ben's got to give at this stage, then there's no way known I would give him another year. I expect several players would pass him.
Also I think our young side showed more passion without him there last week than with him there today. So go figure that.
TigerForce said:He will always be slow
Tigers of Old said:Aah no TF. Cousins was not always slow.
Go back and look at Cousin in full flight. Unrecognisable to the player now.
THIS year he looks slower than last and next year he'll be slower again.
The recruitment has had some benefits but it's time for Cousins to move on.
rockstar_tiger said:If it was a question of taking the spot of a kid, is Tuck playing considerably better than Cousins?
rockstar_tiger said:Ben offers far superior leadership than Tuck.
Tigers of Old said:Just wondering what folks thought of Cousins game today?
I notice he's almost universally been given the tick as our best player against the Roos. I too thought he was near our best if not our best.
Not that it said much..
I couldn't say with confidence that he beat his opponent and despite his number of possessions I sat there thinking he's having little impact on the contest and still looks very slow.
I was actually very surprised to see his stats at game's end.
Tigers of Old said:Tuck isn't in the team for his leadership.
jb03 said:Not exactly sure what you are saying - did he play well or not?
rockstar_tiger said:That's my point.