gutfull said:The French penalty is why the game is shizen..
Soft as Bat sh!t...
Ian4 said:very proud. excellent performance. The back 4 was magnificent, especially Sainsbury. he should be playing in a top league and it's a mystery why he's not. I also thought Mooy and Kruse were pretty good as well as Ryan.
As for the penalty... I thought it was a pen to be honest. But it should never have been overturned by the VAR. not conclusive enough. extraordinary decision.
Fly out to Russia today. I'm pumped behind belief. sort of a bit of closure for me after having to cancel Brazil 3 days before I was due to fly out. ;D
yeah because it never happens in footy. I mean its not like there have been any controversies in recent weeks in regards to staging. :
This is exactly my beef, jb. One replay shows Risdon clearly got the ball first. Any subsequent contact (and it was the slightest of brushes) was caused by the Frenchman. It was not enough to break his stride, he dived.jb03 said:Seems pretty easy for the attacker to make sure one of his legs gets caught up somewhere. If the defender gets to the ball first, is it still a penalty?
tigerman said:If France can defeat Denmark and keep them goalless, Australia are still a chance. They would have to defeat Peru and could get away with a 1/1 draw with Denmark depending how much they can defeat Peru by.
Mr Brightside said:Serious question for the world game followers, was that a good standard game?
Mr Brightside said:Serious question for the world game followers, was that a good standard game?
Mr Brightside said:Serious question for the world game followers, was that a good standard game?
Mr Brightside said:Serious question for the world game followers, was that a good standard game?