Gia, understand your point but take a look at the facts.
It seems things have shifted slightly since earlier in the pandemic. A growing proportion of people hospitalised with the Delta strain are aged in their 30s or 40s.
theconversation.com
"For younger people who are unwell enough to be hospitalised with COVID-19, the outcomes can be quite serious. A large study from the United Kingdom showed
27% of 19 to 29-year-olds admitted to hospital suffered some form of organ damage to the liver, lungs or kidneys — any of which can lead to permanent disability.
A separate study showed
14% of patients under 40 admitted to ICU died, compared with 31% across all ages.
There is evidence COVID-19 can be associated with
sudden deterioration and death in people who seem to be OK, presumably from damage to the heart and sudden cardiac arrest. This phenomenon is very rare at any age.
And younger people are certainly not spared from “
long COVID”. A recent
Norwegian study looked at people aged 16-30 who had COVID-19 but hadn’t needed hospital treatment. It found after six months, 52% had persistent symptoms including loss of taste or smell, fatigue, breathlessness or impaired concentration."
You are obviously well within your rights to wait for your own immunity, but what if your immunity is impaired when you do contract it. Do you really want to expose yourself to potential liver, lungs or kidney damage? You are right that your likelihood of dying from Covid is low however that doesn't mean you are immune to any lasting effects.
Whilst personal immunity "may" be better (we don't know yet). Doesn't it make sense to provide a vaccination immune response, so that when your body does need to also provide personal immunity (its likely to need to once Covid-19 moves from the pandemic to the endemic stage) then this actually just bolsters your defence against it rather than having to identify and fight from scratch?