why not bothShouldn't be entering or will be prevented from entering? Honesty systems don't work in pandemics.
why not bothShouldn't be entering or will be prevented from entering? Honesty systems don't work in pandemics.
Unfortunately "the common good" is still determined by individuals with differing risk profiles. It can't be objectively determined as a universal rule for all. This is my take: the vaccines provide protection against severity of symptoms, but this effect drops off after a fairly short period of time, hence the need to keep getting boosters. Alternatively you could catch COVID and natural immunity will provide greater ongoing protection and against more variants (i'm not sure if it reduces transmission to a great extent), however this will also eventually wear off. Recovery rates are very high for young and healthy people. For me, if you are old and/or have conditions that make you more susceptible to severe symptoms from COVID then you should get the jab. Otherwise if you are young and healthy you should probably avoid it and ideally catch it and recover. In the meantime they should continue to enhance the vaccines to provide better protection against transmission, but it should follow the normal process for vaccine approval to capture long term effects of its use.
are you considered "vaccinated" if you've had covid? and is there any point getting vaccinated?
The article addresses the misinformation spread by anti-vaxxers around hospitalisation and death rates among vaccinated people in Israel.The question is not about if the vaccines help reduce severity of symptoms but whether they stop transmission. The quality analysis you provided doesn't seem to address that.
are you considered "vaccinated" if you've had covid? and is there any point getting vaccinated?
Nope just seen opinions from some of the world's great professors,Thomas barody,Clancy,etc.Empty vessels make the most noise. Wasn't aware that Bakes went on to do a Science degree!
You do realise there’s every chance of lockdowns againGet your jabs, get your passport, get the footy and get on with it.
dunno in a legal sense, but in a practical sense yes you are. There is still benefit in getting vaccinated even then, as you'll have an even broader immune coverage.
Not if we hit double dose 80%.You do realise there’s every chance of lockdowns again
Once at 80% it will be the end of lockdowns and survival of the fittest (and most of the Vaccinated)You do realise there’s every chance of lockdowns again
Not Borody's long suit I'm afraid.Nope just seen opinions from some of the world's great professors,Thomas barody,Clancy,etc.
TT2 has a degree in Google and a diploma of Youtube. The last person to bring up the science is the anti-vax crew.Come on TT2. Its not that hard. You can read all the info and look at the data and then follow links to the source studies from the WHO.
Sorry I know more about this subject than most people I know. I am not anti Vax. But if you have a narrow focus of targeting one spike protein, like the mRNA vaccines do then you force the Virus to mutate i.e. Delta. This is basic science. The Vaccines are creating the mutations.TT2 has a degree in Google and a diploma of Youtube. The last person to bring up the science is the anti-vax crew.
Sorry I know more about this subject than most people I know. I am not anti Vax. But if you have a narrow focus of targeting one spike protein, like the mRNA vaccines do then you force the Virus to mutate i.e. Delta. This is basic science. The Vaccines are creating the mutations.
The Vaccines for the next 15 years if we follow this approach will always be one step behind the virus. This is a perfect business model for the Pharmaceutical Companies.
Sorry I know more about this subject than most people I know.