lamb22 said:Maybe the club followed some good advice albeit 12 months too late.
"So in summary the list is good but unbalanced in relation to age profile, The game plan and the limitations of our coaching staff cant get the best out of our list and ignore to our detriment some class that lays mostly dormant at lower levels. Finally our list is short changed by game day coaching.
I have always acknowledged and applaud Hardwick for the change to culture, his ability to gel the group, his basic decency and likeability. His defensive set ups have improved us immensely from our very low base.
But I put him in the Ross Lyon category. His absolute belief makes him blind to other (and mostly better) options. Like Lyon he continues to stick fat with role players who can only play up to their limit and therefore are found wanting in big games.
He skews list development towards Hardwick drones ( Note how Lyon left St Kilda's list in a shambles) at the expense of balance.
He does not trust those that make the game look easy as it goes against his DNA.
If we had picked Hinkley we would be a vastly different team even with identical players. The coach matters!!
If there are no obvious contenders Hardwick stays but we must give him some help in the areas he lacks, match day, forward structure, identifying modifications to the game plan and players who are not naturals to the game plan which or who will make the team better.
Someone like Bomber would be ideal in a football sense although he is likely to be disruptive. Maybe some senior assistants like knights or someone with a different coaching philosophy who could challenge the ruling mentality on occasions.
If Hardwick was not coach and we had say Hinkley or Clarkson Id be confident of top 2 this year as I think our list is that good.
Sadly Hardwick's greatest skill is never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity."
Interesting to see how the rest of the year pans out
So who are you quoting Chops? I see the speech marks, but no attribution. So I'm left to guess that it must be from your own prophetic words over a year ago. How modest of you not to claim the glory for such wisdom and prescience, and leave us to presume it could only be you!
I only have time for some very brief responses. I agree with some elements: the positive qualities Hardwick brings to the club; but he played 'drones' as you call them because he had none better due to expansion teams looting the drafts, plus poor selections from FJ, so in guys like Morris and Hunt he had some running power, courage, intercept ability, but unfortunately no hurt with ball in hand, too often turnovers.
Your continuing claim of there being "to our detriment some class that lays mostly dormant at lower levels" is just unsupported by the facts. Who are you talking about? McBean? Elton? Soldo? Other young players were taken too late to assist in our finals campaigns, or have talent that is only coming through now as their bodies became AFL ready and obtained some experience. Such as Short, Rioli, Menadue.
Bomber is a fruit-loop, and highly compromised by his contact with Dank at and prior to the Bummers. Clarkson - how is he going now without the great list of players in their prime, topped up with excellent quality FAs ripped off other, weaker clubs?
I question Dimma's overly defensive coaching style, his game-day decisiveness and strategic sense as well, but coaches can change, grow in confidence and improve too. Given far better support and finally some decent kids coming through, despite the mostly inept drafting of FJ and Blair's overly optimistic selections, Hardwick deserved this year to show us whether he has what it takes or not.
Still to be decided IMHO. But he's on the UP.