I will say it again,I emailed Richmond and they asked Tom Brown are you 193cms,Tom stated,no it's wrong, it's a little off,didn't say his height.Ok np, I'll stick to the official verdict provided by the RFC and have a good laugh with you when proven wrong.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Welcome Tom Brown
- Thread starter fastin bulbous
- Start date
192 then? We should have a closest to the pin competition.
From this photo before final round last year, he's at least an eye socket taller than Tresize. I measured my eye socket height at around 3cm so assuming Tresize is 188cm as per RFC website then, assuming Brown hasn't grown any more since last year, he's 191cm. That's my educated guess
.
Last edited:
Tony Braxton-Hicks
There are no stupid ideas, just stupid people
we don't know his height nor his weight. it's a mystery.
192 then? We should have a closest to the pin competition.
From this photo before final round last year, he's at least an eye socket taller than Tresize. I measured my eye socket height at around 3cm so assuming Tresize is 188cm as per RFC website then, assuming Brown hasn't grown any more since last year, he's 191cm. That's my educated guess
View attachment 23007
You think that heavily photoshopped composite image is accurate though?
the club doing its best to manufacture him being 193cm...You think that heavily photoshopped composite image is accurate though?
He's borrowed 3 cm of imaginary height from Jack Riewoldt, who doesn't need it anymore.
Spot on, noticed Selwoods look of " you're going to look great in the blue & white hoops" . Hope we can get him signed n sealed.
I generally notice the team more than individual players. But the thing which I took from King's comment was ability to read the play - that is invaluable and not so easy to find. I hope he is correct, defenders who can read the play well were one of the big advantages we had in 17-20.
The club must think a lot of him, they gave him Bourke's No 30.
DS
The club must think a lot of him, they gave him Bourke's No 30.
DS
Sheesh, they gave David Bourke, Richard Tambling and Reece Conca #30. Last decent player to get the number was Tony Free.
Browns reputation exceeds his output at this stage by a. Long way . No doubt a Very classy player , building very well into his career still a long way to go .
However I no longer believe that van rooyan was a better pick
However I no longer believe that van rooyan was a better pick
Doesn't need meaningless possessions like Shorty and doesn't dump kick like Shorty.
Don't care how many possies here gets, he uses it so well.
Don't care how many possies here gets, he uses it so well.
Tom's style and ambitious play reminds me of a 2017 Broady and we all know where that took Broad so I have hopes that Tom is going to eventually take Nathan's place when he hangs his boots up
Photographers studio?
You bewdy, I’ve been waiting for 7 *smile* years.
Was just fiddling around n looking back at some draft data from 2021. Tom Brown listed as being 186 cm tall, one would think in such an important career year the numbers would be relatively accurate. Reckon if he's managed to grow another 2 whole cm since his draft that might be about the maximum one could usually expect, which would max him at 188 cm. Reckon there might be some fudging in all those 190 to 193 cm calls.
Don't know who this Van Rooyen is. There is a bloke at Melbourne called Vandenhoogenband evidently ........
