-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Welcome to Tigers: Jason Castagna
- Thread starter evo
- Start date
TOT70 said:
That Drummond the only player unavailable on the entire list is absolutely ridiculous.
I can't ever remember an injury list like that.
Tigers of Old said:
The stars are perfectly aligned, ToO.
We won't ever be in a better position heading into a finals series.
Seize the day!
Except for that mark, Castagna had a shocker. Fumbled almost every time he touched it, although he didn't touch all that often. Bolton must be very close to replacing him.
agincourt said:
Wouldn't bring Lloyd in to replace George though. Lloyd isn't going to provide the pace, agility and pressure that George's game relies on and that forward line is thriving on. Lloyd brings you goals at AFL level, not the chaos. Bolton is a more classy chaos IMO
davidc0055 said:
Bolton has fantastic potential but hasn't learnt to play to team rules yet so IMO George must stay in.
Even if George is not getting a lot of the ball dont under estimate the effect of his pressure.
Always dangerous and can pop up unexpectedly like he did last night.
Stengle is currently killing Casey at Half time and he probably has 15 touches 4-5 tackles and 4 Goals and has set up another 2
kid is extremely impressive and goes through the midfield
kid is extremely impressive and goes through the midfield
I was all for dropping him a few weeks ago, but you just can't break up this forward line now, it's too effective. He had a shocker for 3.5 quarters last night, then took the mark and slotted a crucial goal last night.
I'm learning to deal with the fact it's just how he's going to be. Frustrating but important.
I'm learning to deal with the fact it's just how he's going to be. Frustrating but important.
In this case the sum is greater than the parts - to see them all sitting together after the game said it all.
I reckon Stengle would add to the sum when he gets his chance - tearing it up in the VFL today
I reckon Stengle would add to the sum when he gets his chance - tearing it up in the VFL today
Dropping George would affect the F50 as a whole.
The net, trapping the ball, referred pressure, leading options, etc.
Yes, George had a mare offensively. Fumbled, turned it over, was overwhelmed by the occasion.
But he's less expendable than a Markov type in my opinion. He's big, string, committed, tenacious, bloody quick.
Tough call, but for me he stays.
We're winning and winning well. He's a part of the defensive work that sets us up.
The net, trapping the ball, referred pressure, leading options, etc.
Yes, George had a mare offensively. Fumbled, turned it over, was overwhelmed by the occasion.
But he's less expendable than a Markov type in my opinion. He's big, string, committed, tenacious, bloody quick.
Tough call, but for me he stays.
We're winning and winning well. He's a part of the defensive work that sets us up.
I think you're overestimating JCs output and underestimating Lloyds.Mantikorr said:
Last night JC had 6 disposals at 50% DE (but 5 turnovers...don't know how when you have 5 turnovers from 6 disposals you get 50% but anyway).
He laid 4 tackles and had 0 1%ersers and 19 pressure acts.
I still think we would get better output from Lloyd or Bolton or Stengle.
