Agree. Lets start being ruthless in our decision making.craig said:Should be a clear cut delisting there is no merit keeping him.
SCOOP said:For his role, it was never about touches and possessions, it was about impact.
All of the successful forward pockets show glimpses of the elite talent and trickery in small douses at the top level.
The fact that he hasn't had a taste so far and was overtaken by Rioli very quickly and know looks like a complete after thought tells me it's time to move on.
yandb said:If Daniel's surname was Rioli instead of Short he would have been gifted games already.
Rioli played some underwhelming this season and was picked the following week.
Rancey18 said:Agree. Lets start being ruthless in our decision making.
tigersnake said:1. his surname is Butler, not Rioli, its a pointless hypothetical. 2. Butler didn't bash the door down. 3 Rioli was dropped, and 4. also when he did have a quiet one and kept his spot there was a hell of a lot of support for that on here, think about that for a second, big support for a coaching policy on PRE. 5. Some young players are selected for all sorts of reasons that aren't alltogether form-based, thats where coaches earn their dough, having the surname, and sidestep, of a Rioli being one of those reasons is fine by me.
yandb said:1 I have corrected that mistake
2 Rioli didn't bash the door down either. (Butler was injured for a bit of the season)
3 Rioli was dropped after a few quiet games.
4 what hat that go to do with anything, our selection policy is not a popularity contest it should be reward based not a coach playing favourites.
5 So if playing Rioli was a political move by Hardwick that is fine by you?
I just don't see it with Butler in the games he has played, so don't really see the point in persisting. As for the three you listed above, they too should be let go - difference is that they are contracted unlike Butler, hence why I'm not arguing between who should be let go first. In an ideal world they would all be out of contract (or not re-signed in Maric's case) and let go.turk-d-tiger said:Butler has been injured and hardly had a chance to show his ability. What is the benefit of keeping players like Hunt,Morris,Maric on the senior list and delisting Butler this year ?
We could just as easily go with 40+4 or delist Morris.Maric and rookie list them
Butler deserves to be given another year just so we can see what he has to offer - We drafted him for a reason and lets remember that reason before tossing him out after 2 years on the list injured
turk-d-tiger said:Butler has been injured and hardly had a chance to show his ability. What is the benefit of keeping players like Hunt,Morris,Maric on the senior list and delisting Butler this year ?
We could just as easily go with 40+4 or delist Morris.Maric and rookie list them
Butler deserves to be given another year just so we can see what he has to offer - We drafted him for a reason and lets remember that reason before tossing him out after 2 years on the list injured
Bennnny said:already RE-signed.