Hope so but will the tribunal allow it to be heard ?Yep and they'll be asking Dylan to testify if he felt contact to his head.
Hope so but will the tribunal allow it to be heard ?Yep and they'll be asking Dylan to testify if he felt contact to his head.
For those that predicted the "outrage" by Robinson re Lynch then read and be not surprised.
He seems to have a real hatred of anything Richmond.
Strange then that at the weekend, Richmond’s Tom Lynch escaped a penalty for raising an elbow into the face of Hawthorn’s Jarman Impey.
The AFL MRO assessed the incident as: “Lynch takes possession of the loose ball on the wing. Impey approaches to tackle from side on and high contact is made by Lynch on Impey. It was the view of the Match Review Officer that Lynch’s actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.’’
So, the MRO is saying it’s not unreasonable to elbow an approaching player in the face if it’s a fend. That is mystifying.
Greene cops Toby Tax and Lynch walks free.
Try to assess the incident from Impey’s angle — he’s running in, knowing he can get to Lynch to tackle him legally and in the next moment, he cannons into the raised elbow of Lynch, has his eye opened up and has to leave the field.
But it wasn’t unreasonable, said the AFL.
The AFL pats itself on the back for all the work it does on concussion research and CTE — a brain disease that has played a part in ex-players taking their own lives — and making the head sacrosanct.
Yet, Lynch was able to use the elbow, one of the most unforgiving weapons used to injure a player, and the AFL says, “play on”.
For those that predicted the "outrage" by Robinson re Lynch then read and be not surprised.
He seems to have a real hatred of anything Richmond.
Strange then that at the weekend, Richmond’s Tom Lynch escaped a penalty for raising an elbow into the face of Hawthorn’s Jarman Impey.
The AFL MRO assessed the incident as: “Lynch takes possession of the loose ball on the wing. Impey approaches to tackle from side on and high contact is made by Lynch on Impey. It was the view of the Match Review Officer that Lynch’s actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.’’
So, the MRO is saying it’s not unreasonable to elbow an approaching player in the face if it’s a fend. That is mystifying.
Greene cops Toby Tax and Lynch walks free.
Try to assess the incident from Impey’s angle — he’s running in, knowing he can get to Lynch to tackle him legally and in the next moment, he cannons into the raised elbow of Lynch, has his eye opened up and has to leave the field.
But it wasn’t unreasonable, said the AFL.
The AFL pats itself on the back for all the work it does on concussion research and CTE — a brain disease that has played a part in ex-players taking their own lives — and making the head sacrosanct.
Yet, Lynch was able to use the elbow, one of the most unforgiving weapons used to injure a player, and the AFL says, “play on”.
Where was Robbos outcry when Dangerfield knocked out Vlastuin in the 2020 GF? I am pretty sure he used the most unforgiving weapon on that day as well.For those that predicted the "outrage" by Robinson re Lynch then read and be not surprised.
He seems to have a real hatred of anything Richmond.
Strange then that at the weekend, Richmond’s Tom Lynch escaped a penalty for raising an elbow into the face of Hawthorn’s Jarman Impey.
The AFL MRO assessed the incident as: “Lynch takes possession of the loose ball on the wing. Impey approaches to tackle from side on and high contact is made by Lynch on Impey. It was the view of the Match Review Officer that Lynch’s actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.’’
So, the MRO is saying it’s not unreasonable to elbow an approaching player in the face if it’s a fend. That is mystifying.
Greene cops Toby Tax and Lynch walks free.
Try to assess the incident from Impey’s angle — he’s running in, knowing he can get to Lynch to tackle him legally and in the next moment, he cannons into the raised elbow of Lynch, has his eye opened up and has to leave the field.
But it wasn’t unreasonable, said the AFL.
The AFL pats itself on the back for all the work it does on concussion research and CTE — a brain disease that has played a part in ex-players taking their own lives — and making the head sacrosanct.
Yet, Lynch was able to use the elbow, one of the most unforgiving weapons used to injure a player, and the AFL says, “play on”.
geez what is wrong with Robinson?For those that predicted the "outrage" by Robinson re Lynch then read and be not surprised.
He seems to have a real hatred of anything Richmond.
Strange then that at the weekend, Richmond’s Tom Lynch escaped a penalty for raising an elbow into the face of Hawthorn’s Jarman Impey.
The AFL MRO assessed the incident as: “Lynch takes possession of the loose ball on the wing. Impey approaches to tackle from side on and high contact is made by Lynch on Impey. It was the view of the Match Review Officer that Lynch’s actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.’’
So, the MRO is saying it’s not unreasonable to elbow an approaching player in the face if it’s a fend. That is mystifying.
Greene cops Toby Tax and Lynch walks free.
Try to assess the incident from Impey’s angle — he’s running in, knowing he can get to Lynch to tackle him legally and in the next moment, he cannons into the raised elbow of Lynch, has his eye opened up and has to leave the field.
But it wasn’t unreasonable, said the AFL.
The AFL pats itself on the back for all the work it does on concussion research and CTE — a brain disease that has played a part in ex-players taking their own lives — and making the head sacrosanct.
Yet, Lynch was able to use the elbow, one of the most unforgiving weapons used to injure a player, and the AFL says, “play on”.
I can't recall Robinson writing an article on that *smile* sacred cow Selwood when he lined up a bloke last year.geez what is wrong with Robinson?
you'd think after his health scare he might've learned some humility
he kind of undoes his own blither when typing that Impey "cannons into the raised elbow of Lynch"
- meaning Impey ran into Toms arm rather than Tom swinging it as an act of aggression
you'd think Robinson would understand something of the basic principles of football - like protecting possession of the ball ...
Knobbo hates Lynch. I’m sure he had money on him either not leaving the Suns or leaving, but not going to Richmond. Compound that with the fact that his beloved Druggies lost on the weekend and he just had to write this drivel. How his work isn’t dismissed as the ravings of a drunk I don’t understand.geez what is wrong with Robinson?
you'd think after his health scare he might've learned some humility
he kind of undoes his own blither when typing that Impey "cannons into the raised elbow of Lynch"
- meaning Impey ran into Toms arm rather than Tom swinging it as an act of aggression
you'd think Robinson would understand something of the basic principles of football - like protecting possession of the ball ...
go figure.... and on the flip side he gets paid handsomely for it .... !?How his work isn’t dismissed as the ravings of a drunk I don’t understand.
Yeah, and when he struggles to construct a coherent sentence how did he get a job as a journo in the first place?go figure.... and on the flip side he gets paid handsomely for it .... !?
wrong place wrong time ..Yeah, and when he struggles to construct a coherent sentence how did he get a job as a journo in the first place?
Cos Journos have historically been keen on the tipple and the fagsYeah, and when he struggles to construct a coherent sentence how did he get a job as a journo in the first place?