rosy23 said:
Unbelievable arrogance and stupidity of Ted to announce shafting the pipeline before the minister's have even been sworn in to have official discussions with. Same with his announced refusal in regard to the new N/V Irrigation Upgrade without even discussing it with the Canberra people managing it. I hope he can remember how dire the state's water situation was before the fortunate, timely and very welcome rains. I wasn't in favour of the pipeline but it's there now. Rather than shafting it I'd prefer it was maintained for a while until we see how the future pans out. I hope he doesn't shaft the farmers and the environmental aspect of those who did it hard and paid massive money for water during the pipleline life while he's at it. There was more tot hat project than the water going to Melbourne.
I seriously don't understand the big deal about this
- The Liberals, Nationals & Greens all were against the North-South pipeline, Labor was the only ones who wanted it
- The pipeline is currently not shifting any water at all, it was suspended back in the first week of September, so
nothing has changed
- The main electorates that don't want the pipeline are those around the Goulburn River. These electorates are Rodney, Shepparton, Benalla & Murray Valley. Every single one of these electorates elected the National Party by a significant margin. In most of those seats the Nationals were in front by around 70-30. They are only doing what their electorates wanted them to do.
Not only this, but the amount of water that the pipeline was going to deliver is now estimated to be significantly less than what Labor claimed
http://www.theage.com.au/national/pipe-dream-water-strategy-in-doubt-as-forecasts-dry-up-20090319-93fd.html
http://www.theage.com.au/environment/brumbys-lowflow-water-pipe-20090421-ae33.html
The power requirements alone to run the pumps are almost 30% of the total power generated by the Snowy Mountains hydro power station. This is just to shift some water around, much of which will just wash out into the ocean anyway.
I understand that the money was spent to build it, but given it's not getting used anyway and there are significant running costs associated with it, I don't see that as a good enough reason to keep it running. It's just another waste of money from the Brumby government, it's called sunk costs. Perhaps in time if we have another 10 year drought then we can fire it back up again, it would be a lot cheaper to restart it than build it all over again and I haven't heard of any plans to tear it down.