scottyturnerscurse said:Dettori shouldn't be welcomed back.
rosy23 said:Good onya Michelle. Stick it up the chauvinists.
scottyturnerscurse said:Wonderful story lines from the winner.
Terrible race. Dettori shouldn't be welcomed back.
tigersnake said:Preferment was looking good, amongst others.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:At the moment the scoreboard reads men 154, women 1.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:"As for female jockeys I'd like to say 'no comment'. I'd like to, but I have to say 'no bet' as well. Female jockeys just don't have the strength to ride some horses. I'm not potting women jockeys, it's just that I never back horses ridden by them."
- Dr. Turf
That's the belief of thousands of horsepeople. Doesn't mean it's not open to challenge, the same way that the international have led us to question our methods of preparing horses. Would be interested to see any statistics showing women jockeys on par with men, or otherwise. At the moment the scoreboard reads men 154, women 1.
There are rare situations, e.g. on a freewheeling horse or one which races better for women riders, where it won't deter me. As a rule though, if nothing separates two in-form runners of equal ability but the gender of the rider, it's "Sorry, miss".
Doesn't mean this year's winner isn't a good story, either.
22nd Man said:I think the right stat you should be quoting is Cup starters to winners ratio....... women are miles in front.
rosy23 said:Michelle's rides have earned connections well over $20,000,000 in prize money and that's from limited opportunity. Dr Turf has missed plenty of collects due to his ignorant thinking. I wonder how many of the chauvinists bagging women jockeys have ridden a racehorse themselves. There's far more to it than strength.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:This is not really any different in principle to saying "I'm opposed to Muslim immigration because..." and getting howled down and labelled a racist.
"I don't bet on women jockeys because..." results in "Get stuffed you chauvinist".
Racetrack wisdom holds that women jockeys' comparative lack of strength is a disadvantage in horse racing. Not sure why this causes offence. There may also be differences in less tangible things like assertiveness and aggression/willingness to take narrow splits. Let's be honest here, Christmas came early for Michelle Payne. Sue me.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:This is not really any different in principle to saying "I'm opposed to Muslim immigration because..." and getting howled down and labelled a racist.
"I don't bet on women jockeys because..." results in "Get stuffed you chauvinist".
Racetrack wisdom holds that women jockeys' comparative lack of strength is a disadvantage in horse racing. Not sure why this causes offence. There may also be differences in less tangible things like assertiveness and aggression/willingness to take narrow splits. Let's be honest here, Christmas came early for Michelle Payne. Sue me.
rosy23 said::hihi @ "Sue me".
It's a massive generalisation to make blanket claims about female jockeys overall. Lumping them together based on their gender is ludicrous. Some horses need stronger riders, some need a gentle touch. Jockeys are often matched to horses different needs. Some blokes would struggle with a horse a woman can handle and vice versa. Bev Buckingham rode several cup winners and won 3 Tassie jockey premierships as well as apprentice of the year.
Michelle's Christmas might have come early. Winning the Cup would be a highlight in any jockey's career. Don't forget the $20,000,000+ prizemoney indicates she's had plenty of other success too.