As i said, I am not going to get into an economics discussion on this thread as it is off topic.Giardiasis said:You say you don't mistakenly think cpi = inflation, yet you say "inflation over the period averaged 1.5%".
The cpi in Australia increased almost 50% from 1990-2007. We have had reductions in interest rates, because the RBA has forced it lower than the market rate. The current housing bubble has been going on since 1996, so it easily falls within the time frame that the RBA started printing money. Between 1996-2010 housing prices increased 127%, the largest increase in Australian history.
The most obvious result of inflation should be apparent, i.e. the GFC. Many Americans could only pretend they could afford a house given the extremely low interest rates banks were charging. Again interest rates in the states have been forcibly lowered below the market rate, housing prices have tanked because of the bust caused by inflation, and the cpi averaged 1.5% (not inflation). Like I said inflation won't necessarily influence all prices uniformly. All that printed money did was allow Americans to keep consuming at a similar rate they were consuming prior to the GFC. When that money dries up, all their going to be left with is some TVs, some clothes, abandoned houses and a huge debt burden they can't afford. The US is bankrupt.
I am unaware of Ron Paul ever saying the US is headed for Zimbabwe style inflation?
You do selectively edit. I said that CPI over the 3 year tripling of the US monetary base was 1.5% p.a but I also said that interest rates reduced and that housing prices tanked.
The quote on Zimbabwean style inflation was made by Peter Schiff who is an economics adviser to Ron Paul. He made the comments on Glen Beck's TV or radio show and they were quoted in the New York Times.