Sintiger said:
Definitely not wrong. I've asked why they think that way and the explanation always ends with a conspiracy against Muslims, orchestrated by the US or the Jews or some other devil.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Terrorist attacks in Paris
- Thread starter K3
- Start date
Definitely not wrong. I've asked why they think that way and the explanation always ends with a conspiracy against Muslims, orchestrated by the US or the Jews or some other devil.
So whether or not it was a terrorist act depends on the religion of the perpetrators?
That's why the Hoddle Street and Port Arthur shootings were not terrorist acts.
That's why the Hoddle Street and Port Arthur shootings were not terrorist acts.
YinnarTiger said:
Depends on the cause. Bryant was a sandwich short of a picnic and Knight was just "having a bad day".
Think you will find there are links to IS with this one.
I pointed out to L2R that many of the radicalised kids in come from good middle class homes and the first thing thebIS recruiters do is separate thebkids from their parents ideologically.
Of course, as these facts don't fit his opinions he just ignored the post.
Of course, as these facts don't fit his opinions he just ignored the post.
antman said:
Doesn't explain murder. How can rational people be talked into murder?
They can't; these people either are not rational or do not share what we understand to be decent values.
I find it more palatable to believe they suffer from a form of mild insanity, brought on by their religious beliefs. Refer The Satanic Verses.
"A book which was critical of Islam would be difficult to be published now... We're in a difficult place because there's a lot of fear and nervousness around."
- Salman Rushdie, 2012
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
We're all screwed then, 1.6 billion Muslims all out to get us. Better call Borderforce, they will surely save the day.
bullus_hit said:
Don't think I've alleged they're all predisposed to murder, only a disturbing percentage.
Baloo said:
For how long will you deny and make excuses?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/san-bernardino-california-shooting-investigators-search-for-a-motive/news-story/ad26dbdb91980e693a564e3cc0f1facf
This needs to be read in the context of released information being watered down to avert a public panic.
Sintiger said:
Read this before you go. Too good at blaming others to change.
British Muslims blame police and MI5 for radicalising teens who want to join Islamic State
Possibly most disturbing of all.
Baloo said:
A kook he may have been, but the fact remains he attended Islamic extremist rallies shortly before the siege. Not Christian extremist rallies.
It's got nothing to do with the cause.LeeToRainesToRoach said:
To my mind a terrorist is one who inflicts terror on their targets. I'm pretty sure many of the targets at Port Arthur and Hoddle St would have experienced terror.
Baloo said:
This is where we disagree. Charlie hedbo, the Bataclan, 9/11 the same. Denial of Islam"s involvement is fundamentally wrong.
I'll take my lead from guys like hitchens, Dawkins, Harris who have all identified the dangers of Islam.
Plenty of great interviews/debates online between those 3 and various Muslims, Christians and other religious thinkers. none where logic doesn't win out. Islam exposed as clearly the most dangerous of all religions.
<
Death Penalty
|
isis > nazis
>
