Hitchens on Islam - tell me where he's got it wrong.
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_1_urbanities-steyn.html
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_1_urbanities-steyn.html
YinnarTiger said:It's got nothing to do with the cause.
To my mind a terrorist is one who inflicts terror on their targets. I'm pretty sure many of the targets at Port Arthur and Hoddle St would have experienced terror.
Brodders17 said:am i right in assuming this mass killing is a terrorist act cos the killers were muslims?
........
rosy23 said:Recent reports on ABC news starting to indicate you might be spot on in your assumption it was a terrorist act. Being investigated as such at the moment at least.
When you have been building a cache of weapons and have acquired combat gear it's pretty certain it's a terrorist act whatever the reason for it imo.rosy23 said:Recent reports on ABC news starting to indicate you might be spot on in your assumption it was a terrorist act. Being investigated as such at the moment at least.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:Well that excuses everyone. Case closed, continue murdering.
How trite.
I was talking to a Lebanese muslim recently and the part he was struggling with was that any sympathy for ISIS (which he said was a very small minority of the people he knew) was not coming from those born in the middle east it was coming from their offspring who were born and raised in this country. He said the feeling from immigrants was that they were incredibly grateful to be here. The only clue he had was that those who have lived in the middle east understand it better and the younger ones have a more utopian view of it. They also have social media which is influential.antman said:Not at all. It's a cop-out to say "these people are craazzzyyyyy" - and nor does it solve anything, or provide us with any sort of strategy to combat radical recruitment strategies.
Didn't Moris get a hostage to hold up an ISIS flag during the siege? That's a link to ISIS isn't it?LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Sintiger said:I was talking to a Lebanese muslim recently and the part he was struggling with was that any sympathy for ISIS (which he said was a very small minority of the people he knew) was not coming from those born in the middle east it was coming from their offspring who were born and raised in this country. He said the feeling from immigrants was that they were incredibly grateful to be here. The only clue he had was that those who have lived in the middle east understand it better and the younger ones have a more utopian view of it. They also have social media which is influential.
There has to be a clue here, not an answer but a starting point. Why is it that way?
The older generation of muslims here have an attitude that you can teach and guide your kids, reverence to elders is part of how they have been brought up. The younger generation have been brought up that way too but they have also been brought up in a society that has different values, they think differently to their parents.
None of this excuses murder of course but unless we attack the root cause and understand it we won't solve it.
yes and the older ones know that the roots aren't all their cracked up to be.antman said:It's often the second or third generation that want to "rediscover their roots".
antman said:Not at all. It's a cop-out to say "these people are craazzzyyyyy" - and nor does it solve anything, or provide us with any sort of strategy to combat radical recruitment strategies.
But then again it's how you see the world. ALL OF ISLAM IS OUT TO GET US. I don't imagine I'll change your mind on that.
millar time said:This is where we disagree. Charlie hedbo, the Bataclan, 9/11 the same. Denial of Islam"s involvement is fundamentally wrong.
I'll take my lead from guys like hitchens, Dawkins, Harris who have all identified the dangers of Islam.
Plenty of great interviews/debates online between those 3 and various Muslims, Christians and other religious thinkers. none where logic doesn't win out. Islam exposed as clearly the most dangerous of all religions.
bullus_hit said:I ask this question legitimately, who can actually tell me the difference between Sunnis & Shiites? Why have they been feuding for so long and which group represents the best ally in the fight against radicalism?
antman said:Not at all. It's a cop-out to say "these people are craazzzyyyyy" - and nor does it solve anything, or provide us with any sort of strategy to combat radical recruitment strategies.
But then again it's how you see the world. ALL OF ISLAM IS OUT TO GET US. I don't imagine I'll change your mind on that.
tigertim said:Didn't Moris get a hostage to hold up an ISIS flag during the siege? That's a link to ISIS isn't it?
Sintiger said:This is not directly about the terrorist issue but it is just plain scary. The fact is that a lot of what happens in the US could not happen, at least to the extent that it does, if epople couldn't get guns so easily. To me there is a real sickness in US society.
Jim Jeffrries on gun control
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9UFyNy-rw4
LeeToRainesToRoach said:You want strategy? Step 1 - contain the threat, freeze Muslim immigration. So obvious yet seemingly so difficult.
antman said:Muslims are all still people - we have to deal with them one way or another