Disco08 said:05 - 8%, 27%, 2, 0
06 - 13%, 36%, 6, 4
Thanks again.
Pretty good rates if he can get back to somewhere near those figures. If..
Disco08 said:05 - 8%, 27%, 2, 0
06 - 13%, 36%, 6, 4
Disco08 said:2007 stats:
Tambling - 15% (number of errors from total disposals), 43% (number of long kicks from total kicks), 17 goals, 9 behinds.
Bartel - 11%, 37%, 18, 8
Kerr - 12%, 31%, 8, 11
Chapman - 16%, 43%, 30, 15
Hodge - 18%, 39%, 23, 14
Buddy - 44%, 57%, 73, 61
Aside from Buddy, every one of the above (apart from Tambling obviously) had a higher error to disposal rate than Tambling did in their 20 year old season.
The problem with making statements based on biased perceptions is that you just look silly when faced with quantifiable facts.
Disco08 said:2007 stats:
Tambling - 15% (number of errors from total disposals), 43% (number of long kicks from total kicks), 17 goals, 9 behinds.
Bartel - 11%, 37%, 18, 8
Kerr - 12%, 31%, 8, 11
Chapman - 16%, 43%, 30, 15
Hodge - 18%, 39%, 23, 14
Buddy - 44%, 57%, 73, 61
Aside from Buddy, every one of the above (apart from Tambling obviously) had a higher error to disposal rate than Tambling did in their 20 year old season.
The problem with making statements based on biased perceptions is that you just look silly when faced with quantifiable facts.
Skills said:Disco, I've worked it out. You must work for either the RACV or AAMI, calculating Insurance Premiums with sophisticated equations?
Anyway, just for you're benefit, dont get carried away presenting statistics to simply justify the "biased perceptions" of others. I've heard all you're theories and studied the statistics presented. If you were Tambling's defence lawyer, the poor guy would be broke by now. Based on the simple fact you mention a name like Bartel in the comparison of "quantifiable facts", the prosecution would simple rip you case to shreds. So on that note Disco...you know I'm trying to do you a favour here.
Disco08 said:2007 stats:
Tambling - 15% (number of errors from total disposals), 43% (number of long kicks from total kicks), 17 goals, 9 behinds.
Rockster said:I am intrested to know as to why two statisticians GPB , is one to count the effective disposals and one to count all the "c l a n g e r s"
Red Sea Tiger said:Stamp your mark "so called excitement machine", stamp your mark.
Skills said:Disco, I've worked it out. You must work for either the RACV or AAMI, calculating Insurance Premiums with sophisticated equations?
Skills said:Disco, I've worked it out. You must work for either the RACV or AAMI, calculating Insurance Premiums with sophisticated equations?
Skills said:If you were Tambling's defence lawyer, the poor guy would be broke by now. Based on the simple fact you mention a name like Bartel in the comparison of "quantifiable facts", the prosecution would simple rip you case to shreds. So on that note Disco...you know I'm trying to do you a favour here.
Rockster said:the way i see it , of course tambling's error rate is not sky high , he doesnt get it often enough for it to be high
oh dearRockster said:the way i see it , of course tambling's error rate is not sky high , he doesnt get it often enough for it to be high
Skills said:The Tambling thread doesnt need any introduction now...it's well and truly warmed up for the start of the season;
Is he playing tonight ToO?
Skills said:Is he playing tonight ToO?
Rockster said:the way i see it , of course tambling's error rate is not sky high , he doesnt get it often enough for it to be high
Disco08 said:Dividing the number of disposals by the number of errors really isn't that sophisticated Skills. I actually think the stats I showed were quite conclusive. For those of us that don't have superior football knowledge they're quite handy.
Perhaps you could act as the lawyer and rip apart my position which is that Tambling is not a clanger king based on the evidence I presented.
And just quietly, I don't need any favours from you, but thanks for thinking about me.
Lidsand said:bro, this could be the dumbest post of all time
Col.W.Kurtz said:That's a pretty big call, Tambo has attracted a lot of hate over his three years
I hope people don't say that about Bling in 4 year's timeLidsand said:its maybe not as dumb as the krakouer supporters defending him for 7 years