-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Tambling (merged)
- Thread starter nut
- Start date
Lidsand said:
:hihi No but there's no doubt Tiger fans are a passionate lot.
All jokes aside, it's great to hear Tambling is ready to go up another notch.
Lidsand said:
I am looking forward to seeing Bling reinstated to his rightful place at the end of Lidsand's name (and the man himself in all the best players lists).
Rockster said:
I wasn't aware Tambling had many clangers Hamster.
His error count is actually quite low.
Rockster said:
It's actually quite low when compared to plenty of players in the AFL.
Bling's a pretty skilful player Rocky Boy, surprised you hadn't noticed.
I wouldn't say lack of skill has been Bling's problem to date.
Rockster said:
2007 stats:
Tambling - 15% (number of errors from total disposals), 43% (number of long kicks from total kicks), 17 goals, 9 behinds.
Bartel - 11%, 37%, 18, 8
Kerr - 12%, 31%, 8, 11
Chapman - 16%, 43%, 30, 15
Hodge - 18%, 39%, 23, 14
Buddy - 44%, 57%, 73, 61
Aside from Buddy, every one of the above (apart from Tambling obviously) had a higher error to disposal rate than Tambling did in their 20 year old season.
The problem with making statements based on biased perceptions is that you just look silly when faced with quantifiable facts.
Actually when you consider that he has a high long kick % his error rates are excellent.
Disco do you have the full error% and long kick% for all Richmond players?
Disco do you have the full error% and long kick% for all Richmond players?
Lonthalion said:
Of course not. The point is that 15% errors to disposals is more towards the good end of the scale than the bad (especially as Col said when you take into account long kick %) and is comparable to the best players in the competition.
Col.W.Kurtz said:
Sure, any in particular? I'm to tired to do the whole team.
Disco08 said:
Thanks.
Not as bad as I thought it would be given he led our clanger count last year.
Just goes to show Buddy's the one who's making a whole heap of errors.
Disco08 said:Sure, any in particular? I'm to tired to do the whole team.
Patto, Luke and Ranies would be interesting, then I'll leave you alone.
Statistically overall, Raines isn't as bad as you'd think.
Amazing how a few key turnovers at crucial times can distort ones perceptions.
McMahon is not exceptional by any stretch but he did have a poorish year.
Without pushing it have you got his 05/06 figures as a comparison Disco?
Amazing how a few key turnovers at crucial times can distort ones perceptions.
McMahon is not exceptional by any stretch but he did have a poorish year.
Without pushing it have you got his 05/06 figures as a comparison Disco?
