Attitude. Not technique.Hayfever said:How much was due to improved technique and/or attitude I don't know.
Attitude. Not technique.Hayfever said:How much was due to improved technique and/or attitude I don't know.
Tigers of Old said:Attitude. Not technique.
I don't disagree at all that attitude is the first building block. Without that there's no point in technique as it will remain unused anyway.Tigers of Old said:Bottom line is tackling is one of the easiest skills in our game to learn. A willingness to do it is another matter.
Hayfever said:Disagree entirely. It's one of the hardest skills to learn and, once learnt, not that difficult to apply. The general standard of tackling across the AFL is very low but improving. Very few players know how to use their shoulder effectively when tackling.
Sydney's whole gameplan under Roos has been built around a hard-tackling defensive style. Interestingly St Kilda made a major improvement to top the AFL average tackle count in 2009......... no doubt Ross Lyon has added this ingredient. In 2007 they averaged 52.6 tackles per game and had 1941 points scored against them in the 22 rounds. In 2009 they averaged 73.1 tackles and had only 1411 scored against them. How much was due to improved technique and/or attitude I don't know. It would be interesting to find out how they went about it. They added Schneider(ex Swans) and Farren Ray(ex Bulldogs) who were good tackers and improved further at the Saints.
How about a few facts then to support your blase assertion? Swans? St Kilda?Tigers of Old said:What you talking about fool?
Thanks GoodOne.GoodOne said:I agree . learning to tackle properly is one of the hardest skills in the game. That's why not many do it well.
Not if it is around the ribcage or hips and the shoulder is used effectively. Yes if it is around the knees or lower.Baloo said:A classic Union tackle would be called up as tripping in AFL wouldn't it ?
Hayfever said:Thanks GoodOne.
Anyone familiar with Rugby League or Union realises that AFL tackling leaves a lot to be desired.
Hayfever said:Not if it is around the ribcage or hips and the shoulder is used effectively. Yes if it is around the knees or lower.
These pics and especially the video clip below the pics explains it well:-Baloo said:Agree, but the classic Union tackle is around the thighs, slide arms down to the knees and pull in.
The other one is around the waist, pin the arms and drive the guy onto his shoulder which should hopefully pop his shoulder out.
If someone did that then the AFL would have to introduce a send-off rule ;DGoodOne said:What about the one where you turn em upside down and drill their head into the turf. Only need to do 22 of those in a game and you have no opposition left
Hayfever said:How about a few facts then to support your blase assertion? Swans? St Kilda?
Hayfever said:Or are you simply saying most AFL players have a poor attitude as professional footballers?
Few want to hear that sort of thing, though. Apparently it's the simplest of skills. Just run up to them, grab them below the neck, above the knees, pin the arms and drive your opponent hard into the deck. SimpleHayfever said:Anyone familiar with Rugby League or Union realises that AFL tackling leaves a lot to be desired.
It's illegal, it's called a spear tackle. It was becoming more common in the AFL a few years ago, you can earn yourself a decent suspension in both AFL and ARL for doing it. I suspect you knew that already and were just being facetious, though.GoodOne said:What about the one where you turn em upside down and drill their head into the turf. Only need to do 22 of those in a game and you have no opposition left.