Pommell said:Dustin Martin - I dont think I've seen a stronger 1st year player. Fends of players with ease, has so much poise through traffic and has really quick hands. A dead set gun
Again on SEN - Germot said 'Tambling has been good since moved back' at which point he asked why Malthouse was giving him a sly grin. Huddo then said 'Mick has called it as his position.'Tigers2011 said:Tambling was awful in the first half and only came good when played at half back/wing, which is probably his position.
Tigers of Old said:As expected Milne was way too good for our small backs. Murdered them.
Difference tonight was body size and disposal skills.
We miss more targets than we hit and the Aints are the opposite.
Gotta find better players by foot and must learn to block/shepherd and stop these errors under pressure.
Tigerflag2008 said:We are certainly getting better, much better than a month ago. But the good players are standing out now, while the passengers are getting left behind. Too many bystanders tonight, just not working hard enough to get into the game. Sad to see Mitch Morton go backwards. And unfortunate (concerning?) that so many clangers coming from Dusty (8 ) and Cotch (5).
Overall however, I am convinced that Hardwick is doing a good job at developing our kids. I hope in the next month or two we will start to see more structure in our play that allows us more easy positions like the Saints were able to generate tonight.
And wow, Goddard is a bloody good player. Killed us.
Tigers of Old said:Tambling should be our small back pocket.
Tigerflag2008 said:We are certainly getting better, much better than a month ago. But the good players are standing out now, while the passengers are getting left behind. Too many bystanders tonight, just not working hard enough to get into the game. Sad to see Mitch Morton go backwards. And unfortunate (concerning?) that so many clangers coming from Dusty (8 ) and Cotch (5).
How can Griffiths and Taylor possibly be considered in our best side? They have played about 8 quarters combined.RedanTiger said:Without about a third of our best side on the paddock it was always going to be a struggle. Foley, Jackson, Connors, Moore, Griffiths and Taylor unavailable. Browne or Vickery kept out for a farewell game.
Elmer said:How can Griffiths and Taylor possibly be considered in our best side? They have played about 8 quarters combined.
Elmer said:How can Griffiths and Taylor possibly be considered in our best side? They have played about 8 quarters combined.
yep, akka and wangers were put there in there early twentiesTigers of Old said:Tambling should be our small back pocket.
Sir said:Ark,
How do you see that changing?
I was slammed a few weeks ago for suggesting that Nason wouldn't make it,
I accepted he kicked 3 goals last week in uniques circumstances ........
BUT - I did not see a single play tonight that justified Nason's place in the squad.
I accept he is young - but he just doesn't have the requisite physicality - and won't get it.
He'll pop up every now and then - but most of the game he'll run around in circles chasing the ball - and landing ineffectual tackles.
How many times was he brushed aside tonight?