lukeanddad said:Our problem in the past is not so much that we signed 3-yr deals, it was who we signed them with. The likes of Hall, Tivendale & Fiora were mediocre - and youngish - players, with long term deals. The line throughthese guys would extend to the likes of White, McGuane and Nahas (ie they may become serviceable 150-game players, but not A-Graders).
Jack is not in that category. He is already good - and may one day, become a very good (great?) player. I'd like us to lock hime in. He is certainly capable of being our long term #1 KPF.
What a ridiculous attitude, if we use that mantra to negotiate our player contracts we'll never go anywheremb64 said:No,but his market value could reduce
tigergollywog said:jeez a fortnight's a long time on footy. Two weeks ago JR was a skinny, slow, selfish, show pony half forward flanker with an attitude problem. This week he's the key to our next flag. :
I'm happy with 3 year deals but not 5.5 year deals are too dangerous.ZeroGame said:What a ridiculous attitude, if we use that mantra to negotiate our player contracts we'll never go anywhere
What if the players doesn't get injured and keeps improving as they are now? Then the shorter contract will need to be much higher next time. It works both ways you know.
Tigers of Old said:In the current environment I would have no issue with a healthy 3 year deal.
tigergollywog said:jeez a fortnight's a long time on footy. Two weeks ago JR was a skinny, slow, selfish, show pony half forward flanker with an attitude problem. This week he's the key to our next flag. :
Opulentus Tigris said:Jack was also a HFF, and in no way a KPP. 2 weeks is indeed a long time.
NZtiger said:Not sure I can work out what you're on about gollgosh. I think you'll find it was old Crumpet leading a relatively small group of Jack bashers,rather than the general consensus. Barking up the wrong tree here
People keep saying that OT, but that doesn't seem to stop Jack from playing like one. Hardly playing on half-back flankers is he?
Extra bulk over the next few years will help without question, but what else do you want from a 21 year old?
Disco08 said:I don't understand the negativity toward long term contracts. In most sports signing a good young player to a contract that secures him through his prime is considered a real coup.
Streak said:I agree Disco. We have made a hash of a few of these in the past I would admit, but what is the general problem with longer term contracts if you do your homework?